"Genius is never understood in its own time"

Genius often challenges the prevailing beliefs and conventions of a given era, resulting in frequent misunderstandings and resistance. The innovative thoughts and creations of a genius are typically far ahead of the cultural and intellectual environment that surrounds them. Society, grounded in the familiar, tends to view such radical ideas with suspicion, skepticism, or even hostility. Those who think unconventionally or introduce new paradigms are seldom met with immediate appreciation; instead, their insights can seem alien or threatening.

Historically, many of the world’s most celebrated thinkers and artists were initially marginalized. Their work failed to resonate with the general public, who were not yet ready to alter their perspectives or embrace unfamiliar concepts. For example, scientists like Galileo and artists like Van Gogh saw little reward or recognition while alive. It was only later, with the benefit of hindsight and a shift in societal attitudes, that their contributions were validly acknowledged.

This skepticism toward contemporary genius partly stems from a natural human inclination to value the status quo. Established ideas feel more secure, and the effort required to understand or accept new approaches creates friction. Moreover, those who propose groundbreaking changes can inadvertently threaten existing power structures, further deepening resistance. The very nature of genius, its capacity for seeing what others miss and refusing easy compromise, often sets it apart from mainstream society.

Understanding of genius grows as collective knowledge and values evolve. Only with time and perspective can a community reassess what was once overlooked or dismissed. The initial lack of recognition is not a reflection of the value of genius itself, but rather of society’s limits in appreciating it. Genius, therefore, acts as a catalyst for change, destined to be misinterpreted and only later revered.