"God should not be called an individual substance, since the principal of individuation is matter"
About this Quote
The move is both metaphysical and polemical. Aquinas is pushing back against a naive mental picture of God as a cosmic person with a body, a location, and a private allotment of being. Calling God “an individual substance” sounds reverent, but it smuggles in creaturely limitations: if individuated like us, God could in principle be compared, divided, measured, or multiplied. Aquinas’ God can’t be one specimen in a genus, because that would make “godhood” a kind of nature shared with other possible gods. Monotheism, in his system, isn’t just a headcount; it’s a refusal of the whole framework that makes headcounts possible.
Context matters: Aquinas is translating Christian theology into Aristotle’s vocabulary, then bending that vocabulary until it can’t reduce God to a thing. The subtext is a warning to language itself: the closer you get to precision about God, the more you must unlearn the habits of ordinary description.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Aquinas, Thomas. (n.d.). God should not be called an individual substance, since the principal of individuation is matter. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/god-should-not-be-called-an-individual-substance-2027/
Chicago Style
Aquinas, Thomas. "God should not be called an individual substance, since the principal of individuation is matter." FixQuotes. Accessed February 2, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/god-should-not-be-called-an-individual-substance-2027/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"God should not be called an individual substance, since the principal of individuation is matter." FixQuotes, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/god-should-not-be-called-an-individual-substance-2027/. Accessed 2 Feb. 2026.



