"God's only excuse is that he does not exist"
About this Quote
Stendhal turns the problem of evil into a sardonic syllogism. If a benevolent and omnipotent God existed, the world’s cruelty would be morally inexplicable; therefore the only way to acquit such a being is to deny his existence. The line plays with the language of apology and defense, suggesting that all the elaborate systems of theodicy amount to lawyerly excuses. None of them can reconcile plague, war, hypocrisy, and arbitrary suffering with divine goodness. Nonexistence alone clears the docket.
The aphorism reflects the sensibility of Henri Beyle, known as Stendhal, a writer formed by the Enlightenment and the turbulence of post-Revolutionary France. He watched the Restoration re-enthrone church and throne, and distrusted institutions that demanded submission in exchange for consolation. His novels anatomize self-deception with a cool, ironic eye; this sentence compresses the same spirit. It echoes Voltaire’s barbed skepticism and the crystalline wit of the French moralists, but weds it to a moral urgency: disbelief becomes a refusal to excuse preventable suffering.
There is more here than a jeer at faith. The jest masks an ethical wager. If there is no providential guarantor of justice, responsibility shifts decisively to human hands. The line is at once an attack on clerical rationalization and a summons to secular adulthood, urging that love, art, and civic courage replace metaphysical alibis. It also hints at a paradox: to preserve the idea of perfect goodness, one must remove the being whose existence would implicate goodness in the world’s horrors. Better no God than a God in need of excuses.
Austerely phrased and provocatively neat, the statement exemplifies Stendhal’s style: lucid, swift, and mordantly humane. Its enduring power lies in how cleanly it cuts through abstraction to a felt reality of suffering, then leaves the listener with the unsettling but bracing demand to answer it without appealing to the sky.
The aphorism reflects the sensibility of Henri Beyle, known as Stendhal, a writer formed by the Enlightenment and the turbulence of post-Revolutionary France. He watched the Restoration re-enthrone church and throne, and distrusted institutions that demanded submission in exchange for consolation. His novels anatomize self-deception with a cool, ironic eye; this sentence compresses the same spirit. It echoes Voltaire’s barbed skepticism and the crystalline wit of the French moralists, but weds it to a moral urgency: disbelief becomes a refusal to excuse preventable suffering.
There is more here than a jeer at faith. The jest masks an ethical wager. If there is no providential guarantor of justice, responsibility shifts decisively to human hands. The line is at once an attack on clerical rationalization and a summons to secular adulthood, urging that love, art, and civic courage replace metaphysical alibis. It also hints at a paradox: to preserve the idea of perfect goodness, one must remove the being whose existence would implicate goodness in the world’s horrors. Better no God than a God in need of excuses.
Austerely phrased and provocatively neat, the statement exemplifies Stendhal’s style: lucid, swift, and mordantly humane. Its enduring power lies in how cleanly it cuts through abstraction to a felt reality of suffering, then leaves the listener with the unsettling but bracing demand to answer it without appealing to the sky.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|
More Quotes by Stendhal
Add to List
