"However, democracy cannot be defined as the existence of parliaments and elections alone"
About this Quote
Democracy is more than a calendar of polling days and a chamber filled with lawmakers. Ballots and parliaments are the visible rituals of popular rule, but without the invisible infrastructure that protects dissent, ensures fairness, and limits power, those rituals can become theater. Elections can be competitive in form yet tilted in practice by media capture, intimidation, or rule changes; parliaments can exist yet function as rubber stamps. The substance of democracy lives in independent courts, a free press, accountable bureaucracy, equal protection under the law, and a political culture that tolerates opposition and alternation of power.
The remark draws a line between majoritarianism and liberal constitutionalism. Winning an election authorizes governing; it does not authorize dismantling constraints. Democracy relies as much on how winners wield authority as on how they gain it. Fareed Zakaria popularized the phrase illiberal democracy to describe systems where leaders win votes but shrink liberties. The warning is that procedures alone cannot guarantee pluralism, inclusion, or justice.
In Turkey, this idea resonates with competing narratives. Early in the 2000s, Ankara pursued EU-inspired reforms that expanded rights, curbed the militarys tutelary role, and strengthened civilian accountability, suggesting an understanding of democracy that went beyond the ballot box. Later, amid polarization, the Gezi Park protests, the 2016 coup attempt, and sweeping states of emergency, critics argued that the countrys institutions and freedoms eroded even as elections continued. Recep Tayyip Erdogan has often invoked the national will to claim democratic legitimacy, while also insisting that genuine democracy requires performance, stability, and social equity, not just procedures. The tension between these emphases reveals the broader global debate over what makes a democracy endure.
The enduring test is not simply whether citizens vote, but whether they can speak, organize, scrutinize, and replace their rulers without fear. Where those conditions hold, parliaments and elections are pillars. Where they do not, they risk becoming facades.
The remark draws a line between majoritarianism and liberal constitutionalism. Winning an election authorizes governing; it does not authorize dismantling constraints. Democracy relies as much on how winners wield authority as on how they gain it. Fareed Zakaria popularized the phrase illiberal democracy to describe systems where leaders win votes but shrink liberties. The warning is that procedures alone cannot guarantee pluralism, inclusion, or justice.
In Turkey, this idea resonates with competing narratives. Early in the 2000s, Ankara pursued EU-inspired reforms that expanded rights, curbed the militarys tutelary role, and strengthened civilian accountability, suggesting an understanding of democracy that went beyond the ballot box. Later, amid polarization, the Gezi Park protests, the 2016 coup attempt, and sweeping states of emergency, critics argued that the countrys institutions and freedoms eroded even as elections continued. Recep Tayyip Erdogan has often invoked the national will to claim democratic legitimacy, while also insisting that genuine democracy requires performance, stability, and social equity, not just procedures. The tension between these emphases reveals the broader global debate over what makes a democracy endure.
The enduring test is not simply whether citizens vote, but whether they can speak, organize, scrutinize, and replace their rulers without fear. Where those conditions hold, parliaments and elections are pillars. Where they do not, they risk becoming facades.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Recep
Add to List
