"However, the combination of civil resistance, of large-scale mass activities and strikes, with a certain degree of revolutionary violence, could provoke a crisis in the enemy's camp that would ultimately lead to essential changes"

Joe Slovo's quote suggests a diverse technique for achieving substantial political or social change. The declaration highlights a hybrid method, integrating civil resistance, mass mobilizations, and a degree of advanced violence to produce a crisis that might possibly destabilize the opposition's class structure.

To start with, the aspect of civil resistance refers to nonviolent opposition. This can include organized demonstrations, legal challenges, and acts of civil disobedience aimed at disrupting the status quo without resorting to violence. The function of civil resistance is to demonstrate the dissent and frustration of the people, potentially gathering sympathy and support both locally and worldwide.

Large-scale mass activities and strikes form the 2nd element of the method. These are cumulative actions that can disable the typical functioning of society, especially when they include crucial markets or sectors. By doing so, they use economic pressure on the ruling entities, requiring them to attend to the demands of the agitators.

The reference of "a certain degree of innovative violence" presents a controversial but historically considerable dimension. This implies that, in some contexts, nonviolent procedures alone may not suffice to dismantle established systems of power. A controlled and strategic application of violence might be deemed essential to break through certain barriers or incite much deeper systemic change. However, this element requires cautious consideration of ethical ramifications and the capacity for unintended effects.

Slovo recommends that the integration of these strategies can provoke a crisis within the "opponent's camp"-- a metaphor for the opposing or ruling elite. By overwhelming the system with several types of resistance, the concept is to expose weaknesses, cracks, and contradictions within the power structure, possibly causing its collapse or change. The supreme objective is to force important changes, presumably towards a more just or fair system that addresses the requirements of those engaged in the struggle.

Overall, Slovo's technique underscores the complexity of social and political modification, acknowledging that a mix of techniques may be required to accomplish the preferred outcome.