"There was a very convincing argument made that the extremists have won and the aggression is now supported by the majority, therefore fighting until surrender was the only alternative"

Joichi Ito's declaration reflects on the dynamics of dispute, persuasion, and societal assistance in circumstances of extremism and aggression. To translate this quote, it's vital to unpack its components and contextualize its ramifications.

The opening expression, "There was a really persuading argument made", recommends that a convincing case was put forward, most likely utilizing sensible reasoning, emotional appeal, or proof, to assert a particular perspective about the continuous dispute or scenario. It indicates that this argument has effectively affected public understanding or rallied considerable assistance, shaping the understanding or stance of a group or society.

The next part, "that the extremists have actually won and the aggressiveness is now supported by the bulk", suggests that extremist concepts or factions have actually gained traction and potentially control. The term "extremists" usually denotes individuals or groups with extreme views that sit outside normative societal beliefs. Ito suggests these extremists have not just achieved a level of supremacy or success but have likewise handled to acquire the backing of the general population. This suggests a considerable shift in social worths or concerns, where previously marginal or radical ideas have become mainstream.

Lastly, the declaration "therefore battling up until surrender was the only alternative" underscores a sense of inevitability and resignation. Here, "combating up until surrender" seems to depict a circumstance where opposing forces or those who disagree with the extremist stance find themselves with restricted choices. This phrase might imply an unrelenting resist frustrating odds, where surrender might be the last option due to the overwhelming support for the extremism in question.

Overall, Ito's quote can be translated as a commentary on the power of persuasion, the capacity for extremist ideologies to acquire prevalent approval, and the consequential struggles dealt with by those who resist. It touches on themes of power characteristics, socio-political shifts, and the intricate interplay in between ideology and public assistance in forming social outcomes.