"I believe wholeheartedly in marriage. I don't exclusively mean a marriage with a legal contract, but any relationship that constitutes a marriage because of the quality of their relationship"

Helen Reddy's quote expresses a nuanced understanding of marital relationship that goes beyond conventional legal definitions. At its core, the text records a belief in the organization of marriage, however it broadens the interpretation beyond standard confines. Reddy starts by affirming her support for marital relationship, which normally involves a legal contract between 2 individuals, sanctioned by social and legal standards as an official union.

However, Reddy's viewpoint progresses as she dives much deeper into the essence of what marriage can signify. She clarifies that her belief in marital relationship is not limited to the legal element alone. This recommends an acknowledgment that the full scope of a marital relationship can not be completely encapsulated by mere legalities. For Reddy, marriage embodies a connection that exceeds documents to touch on the deeply individual and qualitative aspects of human relationships.

The focus on "any relationship that makes up a marital relationship because of the quality of their relationship" highlights the essential parts of love, shared regard, understanding, dedication, and collaboration. This point of view is inclusive and suggests that marital relationship is essentially about the bond and quality of interaction between people, despite whether it is legally recognized or socially traditional.

In saying this, Reddy acknowledges varied kinds of partnerships that can show the same depth and commitment as traditionally recognized marital relationships. These might consist of longtime partnerships, common-law marriages, or unions that are meaningful and steady yet do not fit into conventional legal frameworks.

Reddy's vision of marriage as described in this quote is progressive and humanistic. It invites an inclusive recognition of numerous relationships, valuing emotional and relational depth over legal formalities. It opens a discussion about the essence of commitment and love, advising us that the power and significance of a relationship lie in its quality and not its legal status. This point of view can resonate deeply in modern conversations around marital relationship equality, civil partnerships, and evolving social constructs of relationships.