"I consider that 9/11 was the day when war was started against my own work and against myself. Even though we are not sure of the links, Iraq was one of the countries that did not lower its flags in mourning on 9/11"

Adam Michnik's declaration reflects a complex interaction of individual, expert, and geopolitical sentiments following the events of September 11, 2001. Michnik, a well-known Polish historian and intellectual, typically speaks from a viewpoint formed by his experiences under communism and his advocacy for democracy and open societies. His reference to 9/11 as the day war was "started versus my own work and versus myself" highlights the profound impact that the attacks had not simply on worldwide politics, however on the intellectual and moral structures that underpin efforts toward flexibility and democratic governance.

Michnik likely views the terrorist attacks as an assault on the perfects he values-- discussion, openness, and understanding in between cultures and nations. The awful occasions of 9/11 significantly shifted global priorities and heightened tensions and suspicions, which might be seen to undermine the type of global and intercultural cooperation Michnik advocates for. In this context, the idea of a 'war' versus his work might signify the wider cultural and ideological clashes that escalated in the post-9/ 11 world, wherein renewed hostilities and governmental policies frequently encountered the pursuit of civil liberties and worldwide dialogue.

The reference of Iraq not decreasing its flags in grieving includes another layer to Michnik's analysis. It hints at the complex global relations and the perceptions of solidarity or absence thereof that surfaced after the attacks. Michnik's remarks reflect the more comprehensive geopolitical confusion and the scramble to identify enemies and allies. While he acknowledges unpredictability about direct connections, citing Iraq suggests an interest in the symbolic gestures of countries and their international stances post-9/ 11-- a duration marked by aggressive foreign policies, such as the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

In summary, Michnik's reflection exposes the emotional and ideological turmoil stimulated by 9/11, highlighting the attack's far-reaching ramifications on concepts of liberty, dispute, and worldwide relations. The quote encapsulates his understanding of 9/11 as both an individual and universal turning point, activating self-questioning on alliances, cultural disputes, and the future of democratic suitables.