"I do not consider it an insult, but rather a compliment to be called an agnostic. I do not pretend to know where many ignorant men are sure - that is all that agnosticism means"
About this Quote
Darrow turns “agnostic” from a slur into a résumé line, and he does it with a trial lawyer’s instinct for reframing the charge. The move is simple: treat certainty as the real scandal. If his critics mean “you don’t believe,” he counters with “I don’t pretend” - a verb that makes dogmatic faith look less like conviction and more like performance.
The subtext is a class and power critique. “Ignorant men” isn’t just name-calling; it’s a jab at the social authority granted to people who speak most confidently about what can’t be verified. Darrow is puncturing a specific American habit: equating moral seriousness with theological assurance. In his hands, agnosticism isn’t apathy; it’s intellectual hygiene, a refusal to counterfeit knowledge for belonging.
Context matters because Darrow’s public life was spent in arenas where certainty is currency: courtrooms, newspapers, and cultural battles like the Scopes “Monkey Trial,” where fundamentalist confidence squared off against modernist doubt. He knew how accusations function: “agnostic” wasn’t a neutral descriptor but a way to mark someone as untrustworthy, un-American, or morally suspect. His response exposes the tactic and flips the moral hierarchy. The compliment isn’t that he lacks answers; it’s that he refuses the social shortcut of speaking with divine backing.
The wit lands because it’s not abstract philosophy. It’s a legal argument about standards of evidence, recast as a character defense: humility as credibility, doubt as integrity.
The subtext is a class and power critique. “Ignorant men” isn’t just name-calling; it’s a jab at the social authority granted to people who speak most confidently about what can’t be verified. Darrow is puncturing a specific American habit: equating moral seriousness with theological assurance. In his hands, agnosticism isn’t apathy; it’s intellectual hygiene, a refusal to counterfeit knowledge for belonging.
Context matters because Darrow’s public life was spent in arenas where certainty is currency: courtrooms, newspapers, and cultural battles like the Scopes “Monkey Trial,” where fundamentalist confidence squared off against modernist doubt. He knew how accusations function: “agnostic” wasn’t a neutral descriptor but a way to mark someone as untrustworthy, un-American, or morally suspect. His response exposes the tactic and flips the moral hierarchy. The compliment isn’t that he lacks answers; it’s that he refuses the social shortcut of speaking with divine backing.
The wit lands because it’s not abstract philosophy. It’s a legal argument about standards of evidence, recast as a character defense: humility as credibility, doubt as integrity.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|
More Quotes by Clarence
Add to List




