"I knew I was doing something right because it was selling so I didn't want to interfere with it"

Robert Sheckley’s words reflect a frank acknowledgment of the interplay between artistic intention and commercial success. His statement reveals a pragmatic approach to creativity, one rooted in responsiveness to audience reception rather than solely personal standards or external validation from critics. The act of creation, especially in literature or other art forms, often involves a tension between self-expression and the unpredictable tastes of readers or consumers. Sheckley admits to recognizing his own effectiveness not through internal feeling or theoretical alignment but through tangible results, sales numbers.

This perspective suggests a certain humility and adaptability. Instead of clinging to perfectionism or constantly second-guessing his process, he trusts the marketplace as a kind of feedback loop. The phrase “I didn’t want to interfere with it” signals that Sheckley understood the value of not overcomplicating or disrupting a formula that connected with his audience. Sometimes, creators are tempted to continuously tinker with their work, seeking an elusive sense of improvement or innovation. Sheckley resists this, instead choosing to honor the mysterious synergy that arises when his output resonates with the public.

His remark may also imply a subtle commentary on the nature of originality and authenticity. By doing something that “was selling,” Sheckley wasn’t necessarily “selling out”; rather, he recognized that his authentic efforts had found their mark. He didn’t feel a need to self-sabotage or reinvent himself unnecessarily. There is an underlying trust present, a belief that consistent success, even if not fully understood, deserves respect.

At its core, Sheckley’s observation speaks to the importance of balance. He respects both the creative process and practical validation. The wisdom lies in knowing when to revise and when to let well-enough alone, appreciating that sometimes success is its own validation and interference can disrupt the delicate connection built with the audience.