"If you don't have collective agreements between unions and employers, governments have to legislate more"
About this Quote
Delors is making a quietly hard-edged argument for social engineering by contract rather than by decree. On the surface, it is a technocrat's observation about regulatory load: when labor and capital fail to strike bargains, the state must step in. Underneath, it is a defense of a particular European settlement Delors spent his career trying to modernize without blowing it up: social peace purchased through strong intermediary institutions.
The line works because it reframes collective bargaining as a form of governance, not a concession. Unions and employer associations are cast as co-legislators, producing rules that are flexible, sector-specific, and politically easier to swallow than one-size-fits-all statutes. That is the subtextual provocation: you can either negotiate complexity or you can have it imposed. Delors is warning both sides that opting out of negotiation doesn't mean opting out of constraints; it just shifts power to ministries, parliaments, and courts.
Context matters. Delors came out of postwar France and the European Community era when "social dialogue" was treated as infrastructure, not nostalgia. In the Delors view, markets need legitimacy, and legitimacy is built through predictable, collectively agreed limits on competition over wages and conditions. The implied critique of Anglo-American labor models is sharp: weak bargaining structures don't produce freedom so much as constant political fights over minimum wages, workplace standards, and strike law.
It's also a subtle defense of the European Commission's preference for consensus-driven policymaking. If you don't want the state writing the rules, Delors suggests, you have to build a society capable of writing some of them itself.
The line works because it reframes collective bargaining as a form of governance, not a concession. Unions and employer associations are cast as co-legislators, producing rules that are flexible, sector-specific, and politically easier to swallow than one-size-fits-all statutes. That is the subtextual provocation: you can either negotiate complexity or you can have it imposed. Delors is warning both sides that opting out of negotiation doesn't mean opting out of constraints; it just shifts power to ministries, parliaments, and courts.
Context matters. Delors came out of postwar France and the European Community era when "social dialogue" was treated as infrastructure, not nostalgia. In the Delors view, markets need legitimacy, and legitimacy is built through predictable, collectively agreed limits on competition over wages and conditions. The implied critique of Anglo-American labor models is sharp: weak bargaining structures don't produce freedom so much as constant political fights over minimum wages, workplace standards, and strike law.
It's also a subtle defense of the European Commission's preference for consensus-driven policymaking. If you don't want the state writing the rules, Delors suggests, you have to build a society capable of writing some of them itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|
More Quotes by Jacques
Add to List
