"It has no enforceable standards to stop a union from conspiring with employers to keep another stronger union out or from negotiating contracts with lower pay and standards that members of another union have spent a lifetime establishing"
About this Quote
Stern is doing what seasoned labor operators do when the ground shifts under their feet: he’s drawing a bright moral line around a tactical dispute. On the surface, it’s a procedural complaint about “enforceable standards.” Underneath, it’s a warning that solidarity can be gamed - and that, without guardrails, “union” becomes a brand label that can be used to undercut other workers as efficiently as any nonunion contractor.
The quote is aimed at a particular fear inside labor: raiding and sweetheart deals dressed up as pragmatism. Stern’s phrasing makes “conspiring with employers” the original sin, because it flips the expected script. Employers are supposed to be the adversary; if a union can partner with management to box out a rival union, the whole premise of collective bargaining starts to look like a cartel fight, not a worker movement. That’s why “another stronger union” matters: he’s not only defending jurisdiction, he’s defending a hierarchy of standards - the idea that gains are cumulative, inherited, and easily stolen.
Then comes the cultural dagger: “a lifetime establishing.” It frames wages and work rules as hard-won tradition, almost craftsmanship, and paints lower-pay contracts as vandalism. Stern is implicitly indicting a model of labor competition that treats workers like market share and contracts like loss leaders. The intent isn’t just to win an internal argument; it’s to make deregulated union competition sound like betrayal, not strategy, by tying it to the most damning collaborator in labor lore: management.
The quote is aimed at a particular fear inside labor: raiding and sweetheart deals dressed up as pragmatism. Stern’s phrasing makes “conspiring with employers” the original sin, because it flips the expected script. Employers are supposed to be the adversary; if a union can partner with management to box out a rival union, the whole premise of collective bargaining starts to look like a cartel fight, not a worker movement. That’s why “another stronger union” matters: he’s not only defending jurisdiction, he’s defending a hierarchy of standards - the idea that gains are cumulative, inherited, and easily stolen.
Then comes the cultural dagger: “a lifetime establishing.” It frames wages and work rules as hard-won tradition, almost craftsmanship, and paints lower-pay contracts as vandalism. Stern is implicitly indicting a model of labor competition that treats workers like market share and contracts like loss leaders. The intent isn’t just to win an internal argument; it’s to make deregulated union competition sound like betrayal, not strategy, by tying it to the most damning collaborator in labor lore: management.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Andy
Add to List