"I'm very happy that the New York Times has spoken well of my stuff; who wouldn't be? But it's not a choice I made"
About this Quote
John M. Ford's quote, "I'm extremely happy that the New York Times has spoken well of my things; who would not be? However it's not an option I made", catches a nuanced viewpoint on recognition and success. At its core, this statement reveals the complicated interaction between external recognition and personal autonomy in the creative process.
Ford starts by revealing authentic enjoyment about the New York Times' favorable reception of his work. The recommendation from such a distinguished publication is significant; it acts as a standard for quality and success in the literary world. The expression "who wouldn't be?" suggests a universal desire for acknowledgment, acknowledging that most individuals, especially those in imaginative fields, value having their work applauded and verified by an authoritative voice.
Nevertheless, the 2nd part of the quote, "But it's not an option I made", shifts the focus from the pleasure of recognition to the essence of creative objective and self-reliance. Ford indicates that while the acclaim is appreciated, it was neither the main inspiration for nor the desired outcome of his efforts. This highlights an essential aspect of imaginative work: the act of development is typically driven by individual enthusiasm, expedition, and expression instead of a calculated pursuit of external approval or honors.
The difference brings into concern the nature of success and satisfaction. Ford appears to promote for intrinsic inspiration, emphasizing the worth of credibility and the artist's connection to their work over the potentially short lived satisfaction of public praise. This viewpoint resonates with many creatives who strive to maintain their creative integrity in a world that frequently relates success with recognition and industrial impact.
Eventually, Ford's quote works as a reminder to creators and audiences alike to appreciate the intrinsic worth of creativity, independent of its reception, and to stay true to one's artistic vision irrespective of external recognition.
More details
About the Author