"In time it will become clear to everyone that support for the policies of pre-emptive war and interventionist nation-building will have much greater significance than the removal of Saddam Hussein itself"

In this quote, Ron Paul is expressing a crucial viewpoint on the foreign policy strategies used by the United States, especially during the early 2000s. His focus is on the wider implications of picking pre-emptive war and interventionist nation-building as basic policy maneuvers. Paul's assertion is that, over time, the repercussions and implications of these strategies will outweigh the instant outcomes, such as the removal of Saddam Hussein in the Iraq War.

Paul recommends that the significance of embracing a pre-emptive war technique-- which involves attacking a possible danger before it emerges-- will have an enduring impact that extends far beyond the immediate geopolitical gains. While the removal of a totalitarian like Hussein may have appeared a clear and direct goal, Paul is prompting an examination of the broader and more enduring impacts such policies can have on worldwide stability, global relations, and nationwide security.

The referral to "interventionist nation-building" further highlights his caution versus policies that include deeply embedding nationwide military and political interests in foreign countries, with the goal of rebuilding them in the image of one's own democratic systems. Paul is likely highlighting the intricacies and unintentional repercussions that often emerge from such interventions, consisting of long-lasting military entanglements, bitterness from local populations, and the destabilization of local balances of power.

In general, Paul's message is an alerting about the potential for these policies to develop substantial geopolitical shifts and new dangers in the long run. He promotes for a more restrained and reflective approach to foreign policy, recommending that the wider effects of interventionist strategies can lead to greater instability and danger than at first perceived. By highlighting the value of thinking about these long-term effects, Paul invites a more cautious and deliberative technique to managing global conflicts and foreign relations.