"Information from destructive activities going back a hundred years right up until today is being incorporated into the system. And as that happens the underlying framework of industrialism is collapsing and causing disintegration"
About this Quote
A century of damage becomes, in Hawken's framing, not just a record of harm but a dataset that is quietly rewriting the rules. The most provocative move here is the inversion: environmental “information” is no longer a moral argument made by activists; it’s an accumulating body of evidence that systems have to ingest. Think dead zones, asthma rates, fire seasons, insurance maps, crop yields, migration pressures, species loss. Once those signals are incorporated into decision-making - finance, policy, logistics, design - industrialism stops looking like progress with side effects and starts looking like an obsolete operating system buckling under error messages it can’t suppress.
His intent is less to scold than to diagnose a phase change. “Destructive activities” is clinical language for something emotionally volcanic; he’s translating grief and outrage into systems talk, because systems are what industrialism respects. The subtext is that collapse isn’t a single Hollywood moment. It’s disintegration: supply chains fray, political legitimacy corrodes, markets reprice risk, communities polarize under stress. Industrialism’s “underlying framework” - extraction, endless growth, externalized costs - depends on keeping consequences off the balance sheet. Hawken argues that era is ending because consequences are becoming legible, quantifiable, unavoidable.
Context matters: Hawken’s work has long tried to bridge environmentalism and practical redesign (business, climate solutions, regeneration). This line lands as both warning and odd optimism: once reality is fully accounted for, the old framework doesn’t get “fixed.” It gets replaced.
His intent is less to scold than to diagnose a phase change. “Destructive activities” is clinical language for something emotionally volcanic; he’s translating grief and outrage into systems talk, because systems are what industrialism respects. The subtext is that collapse isn’t a single Hollywood moment. It’s disintegration: supply chains fray, political legitimacy corrodes, markets reprice risk, communities polarize under stress. Industrialism’s “underlying framework” - extraction, endless growth, externalized costs - depends on keeping consequences off the balance sheet. Hawken argues that era is ending because consequences are becoming legible, quantifiable, unavoidable.
Context matters: Hawken’s work has long tried to bridge environmentalism and practical redesign (business, climate solutions, regeneration). This line lands as both warning and odd optimism: once reality is fully accounted for, the old framework doesn’t get “fixed.” It gets replaced.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List

