"Moral justification is a powerful disengagement mechanism. Destructive conduct is made personally and socially acceptable by portraying it in the service of moral ends. This is why most appeals against violent means usually fall on deaf ears"
About this Quote
Bandura is naming the move that lets ordinary people do extraordinary harm without feeling like villains: laundering violence through virtue. “Moral justification” sounds like a philosophy seminar; he frames it as a “disengagement mechanism,” the psychological gearshift that disconnects action from conscience. The word “powerful” matters. He isn’t talking about a rare pathology, but a reliable feature of human social life - especially in groups, institutions, and nations that need people to comply.
The subtext is bleakly pragmatic: arguments about nonviolence don’t fail because the facts are weak, but because the listener’s moral self-image has already been protected. Once destructiveness is narrated as duty, defense, liberation, purity, progress - pick your banner - the actor gains not only permission but status. Harm stops looking like harm and starts looking like sacrifice. “Personally and socially acceptable” is the tell: justification isn’t just private self-talk; it’s a shared script, reinforced by peers, media, leaders, and rituals. Violence becomes a community project.
Contextually, Bandura’s work on moral disengagement sits in the shadow of 20th-century mass violence and the postwar question of how “normal” people participate in cruelty. His answer isn’t melodrama about monsters. It’s the mundane machinery of meaning-making. That last line lands like a cold forecast: if you want to reduce violent means, you can’t only condemn the means. You have to contest the moral story that makes the means feel necessary, even noble.
The subtext is bleakly pragmatic: arguments about nonviolence don’t fail because the facts are weak, but because the listener’s moral self-image has already been protected. Once destructiveness is narrated as duty, defense, liberation, purity, progress - pick your banner - the actor gains not only permission but status. Harm stops looking like harm and starts looking like sacrifice. “Personally and socially acceptable” is the tell: justification isn’t just private self-talk; it’s a shared script, reinforced by peers, media, leaders, and rituals. Violence becomes a community project.
Contextually, Bandura’s work on moral disengagement sits in the shadow of 20th-century mass violence and the postwar question of how “normal” people participate in cruelty. His answer isn’t melodrama about monsters. It’s the mundane machinery of meaning-making. That last line lands like a cold forecast: if you want to reduce violent means, you can’t only condemn the means. You have to contest the moral story that makes the means feel necessary, even noble.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Albert
Add to List
