"Nearly one in ten Americans are still out of work. And still, the President and Congress are focused on ramming through their health-care bill, whatever it takes, whatever the cost"
About this Quote
In this quote, Scott Brown is revealing criticism of the U.S. political management, particularly the President and Congress, for prioritizing healthcare legislation at a time when the nation is facing significant joblessness difficulties. By specifying that "almost one in 10 Americans are still out of work", Brown is highlighting the severity of the unemployment concern, suggesting that it needs to be the main focus of the federal government's efforts. The figure underscores the significant part of the population affected by economic instability, therefore calling into question the concerns of the federal government.
The use of the expression "ramming through their health-care costs" indicates a powerful and maybe undemocratic technique by the federal government in passing the legislation. This option of words recommends that the bill is being pressed forward aggressively, potentially without sufficient consideration, argument, or public support. It conveys a sense of urgency and determination on the part of the federal government to enact the legislation, despite the possible opposition or consequences.
The repetition of "whatever it takes, whatever the cost" highlights the perceived recklessness or disregard for prospective unfavorable effects-- both economically and politically-- of passing the healthcare expense. Brown is most likely concerned that such a particular focus might cause neglecting other pressing concerns like unemployment. Here, Brown appears to suggest that the federal government's persistence on concentrating on the health care legislation could lead to resource allowance that may otherwise help resolve the urgent problem of joblessness.
In General, Scott Brown's quote reflects an important perspective on the top priorities and methods of the political leadership throughout a time of financial difficulty. It raises questions about which problems ought to be focused on by chosen authorities and how they need to approach legislation that might have significant consequences.
More details
About the Author