"Now, China, India have set goals. We're going to be able to review what they're doing. We're going to be able to challenge them if they don't meet those goals. We're going to pursue this anyway, because the President understands that our future lies with a clean energy economy. We've doubled renewables this year. There are millions of jobs to be had there, more energy security, so we're going to pursue this"

David Axelrod’s statement highlights a multifaceted approach to addressing global climate change and fostering a clean energy economy. He points to China and India, two of the world’s largest and most rapidly developing countries, noting their commitment to emission-reduction goals. By bringing up these nations, Axelrod situates the United States in a global context, underscoring that climate action is not a solitary endeavor but one requiring international cooperation and accountability. The mention of reviews and the ability to challenge China and India implies a shift toward more transparent and enforceable international agreements. It reflects a recognition that previous global efforts have suffered from a lack of binding commitments and accountability measures.

At the same time, Axelrod emphasizes the United States’ determination to proceed independently toward a clean energy future, regardless of what other nations might do. He indicates that the President sees clean energy as central to the country’s economic and national interests. The reference to doubling renewables highlights a tangible measure of progress within a year, serving as evidence that the country is making strides toward large-scale adoption of cleaner sources of energy. The assertion is that these efforts are not merely environmental; they are directly linked to economic opportunity through the creation of millions of jobs and greater energy security. These are themes designed to appeal broadly , to those concerned with the environment, the economy, and national security.

Axelrod’s message is thus both pragmatic and optimistic. He recognizes the complexities and potential diplomatic challenges of international climate action but insists on the inevitability and desirability of pursuing clean energy. This determination reflects an understanding that leadership on climate issues is both a domestic imperative and a form of global influence, with the potential for significant positive impact at home and abroad.