"One can be the master of what one does, but never of what one feels"
About this Quote
Flaubert, the great zealot of control, slips a needle under his own myth here. This is a writer who treated style like a moral discipline: sentences sanded to a cold shine, emotions rendered with surgical distance. So the punch lands in the contrast. You can train the hand, the habit, the craft; the inner weather does what it wants.
The intent isn’t to romanticize emotional chaos. It’s closer to a warning about the limits of self-command. “Master” is a hard, almost industrial word, suggesting ownership and technique. Flaubert grants that kind of mastery to actions: what you do can be revised, rehearsed, perfected. Feelings refuse that economy. They arrive uninvited, change without permission, and persist past the point of usefulness. The subtext is quietly anti-bourgeois: the 19th-century fantasy that a respectable person can manage everything through willpower and propriety gets punctured by the body’s stubborn autonomy.
Context matters because Flaubert’s novels are obsessed with what happens when desire collides with social scripts. Think of Madame Bovary: a life designed to look correct, undone by longing that can’t be reasoned away. The line reads like the author’s private rulebook for realism: don’t lie about the heart’s volatility just because you can discipline the prose.
It works because it refuses consolation. The split it draws is uncomfortable but recognizable: competence is teachable; feeling is not. Flaubert offers a bleak kind of freedom too: if emotions can’t be mastered, they also can’t be fully blamed into submission.
The intent isn’t to romanticize emotional chaos. It’s closer to a warning about the limits of self-command. “Master” is a hard, almost industrial word, suggesting ownership and technique. Flaubert grants that kind of mastery to actions: what you do can be revised, rehearsed, perfected. Feelings refuse that economy. They arrive uninvited, change without permission, and persist past the point of usefulness. The subtext is quietly anti-bourgeois: the 19th-century fantasy that a respectable person can manage everything through willpower and propriety gets punctured by the body’s stubborn autonomy.
Context matters because Flaubert’s novels are obsessed with what happens when desire collides with social scripts. Think of Madame Bovary: a life designed to look correct, undone by longing that can’t be reasoned away. The line reads like the author’s private rulebook for realism: don’t lie about the heart’s volatility just because you can discipline the prose.
It works because it refuses consolation. The split it draws is uncomfortable but recognizable: competence is teachable; feeling is not. Flaubert offers a bleak kind of freedom too: if emotions can’t be mastered, they also can’t be fully blamed into submission.
Quote Details
| Topic | Free Will & Fate |
|---|
More Quotes by Gustave
Add to List












