"People who lean on logic and philosophy and rational exposition end by starving the best part of the mind"
About this Quote
Yeats is picking a fight with the modern world as it’s being born: a culture newly intoxicated by systems, proofs, and “reasonable” explanations that promise to drain mystery out of experience like it’s a contaminant. Coming from a poet who courted myth, ritual, and the occult, the line isn’t anti-intellectual so much as anti-reductionist. The target is the habit of leaning on rational exposition until it becomes a crutch, a way to avoid the riskier forms of knowing.
“Starving the best part of the mind” is a deliberately bodily metaphor. Reason isn’t cast as evil; it’s cast as a diet that can turn into malnutrition. Yeats implies the mind has appetites logic can’t satisfy: imagination, intuition, sensual attention, the capacity to be moved by symbols whose meaning can’t be paraphrased without being destroyed. Rationalism, in his framing, doesn’t merely miss those faculties; it actively weakens them through disuse.
The subtext is also political and cultural. Yeats lived through the late-Victorian faith in progress, the rise of scientific prestige, and the bureaucratic temper of empire and modern institutions. In Ireland’s cultural revival, art and myth weren’t escapism; they were tools for national and spiritual self-definition against an order that prized the “objective” and administrable.
The line works because it turns a common virtue into a warning: the smartest posture can become a form of self-imposed poverty. Yeats isn’t arguing for ignorance. He’s arguing that explanation can become a substitute for encounter, and that a mind fed only on reasons may lose its hunger for meaning.
“Starving the best part of the mind” is a deliberately bodily metaphor. Reason isn’t cast as evil; it’s cast as a diet that can turn into malnutrition. Yeats implies the mind has appetites logic can’t satisfy: imagination, intuition, sensual attention, the capacity to be moved by symbols whose meaning can’t be paraphrased without being destroyed. Rationalism, in his framing, doesn’t merely miss those faculties; it actively weakens them through disuse.
The subtext is also political and cultural. Yeats lived through the late-Victorian faith in progress, the rise of scientific prestige, and the bureaucratic temper of empire and modern institutions. In Ireland’s cultural revival, art and myth weren’t escapism; they were tools for national and spiritual self-definition against an order that prized the “objective” and administrable.
The line works because it turns a common virtue into a warning: the smartest posture can become a form of self-imposed poverty. Yeats isn’t arguing for ignorance. He’s arguing that explanation can become a substitute for encounter, and that a mind fed only on reasons may lose its hunger for meaning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List









