"Prior to being allowed to enter the profession, prospective teachers should be asked to talk with a group of friendly students for at least half an hour and be able to engage them in an interesting conversation about any subject the prospective teacher wants to talk about"
About this Quote
William Glasser shifts the bar for teacher readiness from credentials to connection. The proposed test is simple and radical: sit with a small group of students and hold their attention for thirty minutes on any topic you choose. The metric is not content recall or lesson plan structure; it is the ability to spark curiosity, sustain dialogue, and make learners feel seen. That focus reflects Glasser’s larger view from Choice Theory and Reality Therapy that learning is energized by relationships and internal motivation, not external control.
Conversation is the crucible of classroom life. In half an hour, a prospective teacher reveals whether they can read a room, invite participation, and adjust on the fly. Choosing the subject allows the teacher to lead with authentic enthusiasm; if passion does not translate into shared interest, what will happen when the topic is assigned by the curriculum? Friendly students lower the stakes, but they are still a real audience, offering cues that demand empathy, pacing, and flexibility. The test is not a performance monologue. It requires listening, asking better questions, and building on what students bring, a rehearsal for culturally responsive practice.
Such a standard also reframes classroom management. Rather than preparing to enforce compliance, the teacher learns to prevent disruption by meeting needs for belonging, competence, freedom, and fun. If students are engaged in meaningful talk, control follows from cooperation. The time requirement matters. A quick hook is easy; sustaining shared attention while minds wander and energy shifts demonstrates the deeper craft.
One might worry this privileges extroversion. Yet the best conversationalists are often the best listeners. Soft-spoken teachers who create space, notice nuance, and weave student insights into a living discussion will succeed. Glasser’s proposal offers a humane gatekeeping principle: before teaching students, prove you can be with students. Skill with people is not ancillary to pedagogy; it is the core of it.
Conversation is the crucible of classroom life. In half an hour, a prospective teacher reveals whether they can read a room, invite participation, and adjust on the fly. Choosing the subject allows the teacher to lead with authentic enthusiasm; if passion does not translate into shared interest, what will happen when the topic is assigned by the curriculum? Friendly students lower the stakes, but they are still a real audience, offering cues that demand empathy, pacing, and flexibility. The test is not a performance monologue. It requires listening, asking better questions, and building on what students bring, a rehearsal for culturally responsive practice.
Such a standard also reframes classroom management. Rather than preparing to enforce compliance, the teacher learns to prevent disruption by meeting needs for belonging, competence, freedom, and fun. If students are engaged in meaningful talk, control follows from cooperation. The time requirement matters. A quick hook is easy; sustaining shared attention while minds wander and energy shifts demonstrates the deeper craft.
One might worry this privileges extroversion. Yet the best conversationalists are often the best listeners. Soft-spoken teachers who create space, notice nuance, and weave student insights into a living discussion will succeed. Glasser’s proposal offers a humane gatekeeping principle: before teaching students, prove you can be with students. Skill with people is not ancillary to pedagogy; it is the core of it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List
