"Progressivism is the cancer in America and it is eating our Constitution, and it was designed to eat the Constitution, to progress past the Constitution"

In the quote by Glenn Beck, "Progressivism is the cancer in America and it is eating our Constitution, and it was created to eat the Constitution, to progress past the Constitution", numerous crucial styles emerge that show Beck's ideological position and criticism of progressivism.

To start with, Beck uses the metaphor of "cancer" to describe progressivism, recommending that he views it as a damaging and insidious force within American society. Cancer is a health problem that grows uncontrollably and destructively, implying that Beck sees progressivism as a threat that weakens the fundamental concepts and structures of the United States.

The specific target of this "cancer", according to Beck, is the U.S. Constitution. By stating that progressivism is "eating our Constitution", Beck is recommending that progressive policies and ideas deteriorate or weaken the Constitutional structure and its original intent. This can be analyzed as a criticism of attempts to adapt or reinterpret the Constitution in manner ins which Beck thinks stray from its original significance or function.

Furthermore, the phrase, "it was designed to eat the Constitution", suggests a belief that the foundational objective of progressivism is to move beyond or circumvent the Constitution completely. This shows a view that progressivism naturally looks for to undermine traditional governance structures and concepts developed by the Founding Fathers.

Lastly, the quote recommends that progressivism aims to "progress past the Constitution". This suggests a belief that progressivism looks for to evolve or fundamentally change American governance and society beyond the boundaries of what the Constitution allows, perhaps through new analyses or by establishing new norms that Beck views as incompatible with the nation's foundational document.

Overall, Beck's declaration shows a deep skepticism and concern about progressivism's influence on American worths and institutions, especially its viewed threat to the long-lasting authority and integrity of the Constitution. This view lines up with a wider conservative review that highlights strict adherence to the original intent of the Constitution and wariness of transformative social and political modification.