"Relativism is not indifference; on the contrary, passionate indifference is necessary in order for you not to hear the voices that oppose your absolute decrees"

Karel Capek's quote, "Relativism is not indifference; on the contrary, enthusiastic indifference is required in order for you not to hear the voices that oppose your outright decrees", presents a nuanced discussion about the nature of relativism and the human tendency to adhere to absolutes. At first look, the quote appears paradoxical, juxtaposing "relativism" with "indifference" and suggesting that indifference can be "passionate.".

Relativism is the philosophical viewpoint that concepts and values are not absolute however are rather relative to the viewpoints or contexts from which they emerge. Capek clarifies that relativism needs to not be confused with simple indifference to different ideas or point of views. Regardless of appearing similar, indifference here is described as a needed defense mechanism, serving to dismiss or disregard dissenting viewpoints that challenge one's recognized beliefs or outright decrees.

The expression "passionate indifference" further complicates the interpretation. It indicates an intentional, maybe even fervent, commitment to disregarding opposing views. This can be understood as a review of human habits, where individuals end up being so established in their beliefs or ideologies that they actively choose to overlook alternative viewpoints. The "passion" denotes a strong, emotional financial investment in what might outwardly appear as indifference. This condition enables them to keep their outright, possibly dogmatic, positions without the discomfort or disruption brought by external criticism.

Capek's words can for that reason be viewed as a caution against the dangers of dogmatism disguised as relativism. By cultivating "enthusiastic indifference", one dangers separating themselves from valuable discourse and review. Authentic relativism would require the acknowledgment and consideration of differing viewpoints, whereas the enthusiastic indifference Capek describes results in an echo chamber of one's own beliefs. The challenge is for individuals to remain available to other voices instead of silencing them through indifference, maintaining the true spirit of relativism which enables a richer, more detailed understanding of the world.