"Say what you have to say in the fewest possible words"
About this Quote
Brevity, in Arthur Bryant's hands, isn’t a stylistic preference; it’s a moral posture. A historian who helped narrate Britain’s 20th-century self-image, Bryant understood how easily language becomes a fog machine: it can make weak evidence look sturdy, make prejudice sound like tradition, make political goals feel inevitable. “Say what you have to say in the fewest possible words” is a command to strip away that mist and leave only the load-bearing beams.
The line works because it smuggles in a quiet indictment. If you can’t state your point cleanly, maybe you don’t know it; if you won’t, maybe you’re protecting it from scrutiny. Bryant’s “have to” is doing the heavy lifting: not what you’d like to say, not what flatters your side, but what the record requires. It’s an ethic of necessity over performance, aimed as much at ego as at prose.
Context matters. Bryant wrote in an era of mass politics, propaganda, and ceremonial rhetoric, when the public sphere rewarded grand phrasing and patriotic haze. A historian’s credibility depends on resisting those incentives. The best historical writing makes you feel the argument tightening like a screw, not blooming like a speech. Bryant’s rule is less about minimalism than about accountability: fewer words mean fewer places to hide, and a clearer view of whether the claim actually stands up.
The line works because it smuggles in a quiet indictment. If you can’t state your point cleanly, maybe you don’t know it; if you won’t, maybe you’re protecting it from scrutiny. Bryant’s “have to” is doing the heavy lifting: not what you’d like to say, not what flatters your side, but what the record requires. It’s an ethic of necessity over performance, aimed as much at ego as at prose.
Context matters. Bryant wrote in an era of mass politics, propaganda, and ceremonial rhetoric, when the public sphere rewarded grand phrasing and patriotic haze. A historian’s credibility depends on resisting those incentives. The best historical writing makes you feel the argument tightening like a screw, not blooming like a speech. Bryant’s rule is less about minimalism than about accountability: fewer words mean fewer places to hide, and a clearer view of whether the claim actually stands up.
Quote Details
| Topic | Writing |
|---|
More Quotes by Arthur
Add to List









