"Self-preservation, nature's first great law, all the creatures, except man, doth awe"

Andrew Marvell's quote, "Self-preservation, nature's first excellent law, all the creatures, except guy, doth awe", uses a critique of humanity in contrast to the instinctual habits of other animals. At its core, Marvell underscores the fundamental drive of self-preservation inherent in all living beings. This instinct is recognized as a doctrine of nature, dictating habits focused on survival and continuity of life.

The expression "nature's first excellent law" highlights the value of self-preservation as the primary concept governing the lives of animals. For animals, this law is an indisputable force, directing them through instinctive actions to avoid danger, protected food, and recreate. Marvell mentions that all animals run under the awe of this basic regulation, stressing the natural order where survival impulse rules supreme.

Nevertheless, Marvell presents a striking contrast with the words "except man". Here, he recommends that people, unlike other creatures, are not exclusively driven by the instinct of self-preservation. This discrepancy indicates that humans have the special ability to override or overlook natural impulses due to higher reasoning, emotions, and desires that typically cloud judgment. Such capabilities enable people to act versus their own interests in ways that may threaten their wellness or survival.

Marvell might be critiquing how human beings can participate in self-destructive habits, driven by aspects like pride, aspiration, greed, or ideology, which can supersede the standard instinct for self-preservation. This internal conflict is emblematic of the complexity of human nature, setting individuals apart from the rest of the animal kingdom.

The quote acts as a reflection on the duality of human nature: having both the knowledge to recognize the importance of self-preservation and the recklessness to sometimes ignore it. Through this lens, Marvell welcomes reflection on how human consciousness and free will both enrich and endanger our presence, providing a paradox that continues to be relevant in philosophical and ethical discussions today.