"Since taking office, President Obama has signed into law spending increases of nearly 25 percent for domestic government agencies - an 84 percent increase when you include the failed stimulus. All of this new government spending was sold as 'investment.'"

Paul Ryan's quote provides a critique of the financial policies enacted during President Obama's administration, especially focusing on the increase in government spending. Ryan, a Republican and a financial conservative, is understood for advocating minimal federal government spending, and his declaration reflects his opposition to what he views as extreme financial expansion.

The quote begins by noting a substantial increase in costs for domestic government firms, quantified as almost 25 percent. This figure recommends a considerable growth in governmental expenditure aimed at numerous domestic programs and efforts. Ryan likely views this boost as an overexpansion of federal government impact and a departure from a more restrained financial approach.

Additionally, Ryan highlights an "84 percent boost when you consist of the stopped working stimulus", referring to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The stimulus bundle, passed in response to the Great Recession, was created to boost economic activity through federal government investments in facilities, education, health, and renewable energy. While supporters argued it was required to start the economy, critics like Ryan saw it as inefficient, dubbing it a failure in regards to its financial effect and financial obligation.

When Ryan uses the term "financial investment" in quotation marks, he is most likely expressing skepticism about the characterization of government costs as beneficial financial investments. While proponents may argue that such costs prepares for future economic growth, Ryan's tone recommends shock, indicating that these expenditures do not yield the guaranteed helpful returns and rather contribute to nationwide financial obligation and fiscal imbalance.

In general, the quote catches an essential ideological divide in American politics regarding the role of government in economic management-- between those who view government spending as crucial for financial stability and development, and those who see it as an overreach that results in inefficiencies and increased national financial obligation. Ryan's declaration is a clear articulation of the latter point of view, highlighting care versus unchecked governmental costs offered under the guise of financial investment.