"That's my personal view I would say most in my caucus agree with that but there are some who don't and I've always said that on these kinds of moral issues, people have the right to their own opinions"
About this Quote
Harper’s line is a small masterclass in political self-insulation: it advances a position while laundering it through the language of tolerance and caucus management. “That’s my personal view” is the key tell. It signals conviction without committing the machinery of government. In parliamentary politics, where the line between private belief and public action is supposed to matter, “personal” is a soft shield: it reassures socially conservative voters that he has instincts they recognize, while giving moderates permission to treat it as non-operative sentiment.
Then comes the tactical triangulation: “most in my caucus agree… but there are some who don’t.” Harper presents himself as both aligned with the majority and respectful of dissent, a leader who can count votes without seeming to enforce purity. The phrasing is managerial, not prophetic; it’s about keeping a coalition intact. You can hear the implicit promise to backbenchers: you won’t be punished for deviating, at least not publicly.
The most loaded move is the pivot to “moral issues.” Labeling something “moral” elevates it above policy wonkery and into identity territory, where compromise is harder and emotions run hotter. Yet he immediately defuses that heat with a liberal-sounding principle: “people have the right to their own opinions.” It’s a careful reframing of a substantive conflict into a procedural one. The subtext: whatever the issue at hand (often code for abortion, same-sex marriage, or related culture-war flashpoints in Canadian politics), he wants the debate to be about pluralism and party unity, not about his government taking aggressive steps. It’s conviction packaged as restraint.
Then comes the tactical triangulation: “most in my caucus agree… but there are some who don’t.” Harper presents himself as both aligned with the majority and respectful of dissent, a leader who can count votes without seeming to enforce purity. The phrasing is managerial, not prophetic; it’s about keeping a coalition intact. You can hear the implicit promise to backbenchers: you won’t be punished for deviating, at least not publicly.
The most loaded move is the pivot to “moral issues.” Labeling something “moral” elevates it above policy wonkery and into identity territory, where compromise is harder and emotions run hotter. Yet he immediately defuses that heat with a liberal-sounding principle: “people have the right to their own opinions.” It’s a careful reframing of a substantive conflict into a procedural one. The subtext: whatever the issue at hand (often code for abortion, same-sex marriage, or related culture-war flashpoints in Canadian politics), he wants the debate to be about pluralism and party unity, not about his government taking aggressive steps. It’s conviction packaged as restraint.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List




