"The accepted definition of a serial killer is a person who kills at least three times with a cooling off period in between his murders"
About this Quote
Pat Brown, a criminal profiler, points to two pillars that separate serial homicide from other forms of lethal violence: repetition across discrete events and a psychological reset between them. The number functioned for years as a rule of thumb in criminology, with three murders used to distinguish a serial offender from a one-time mass murderer or a spree killer whose crimes unfold in a single, continuous burst. The cooling off period is the crucial hinge. It signals a pause in activity long enough for the offender to return to ordinary routines, ruminate, refine fantasies, and plan the next attack. That cycle of tension, release, and recalibration often shapes the offenders ritual, victim selection, and geographic patterns.
The field has evolved. The FBI shifted in the mid-2000s to a broader definition of two or more victims in separate events, generally with a cooling off period. That change was meant to improve early detection and avoid waiting for a third victim before recognizing a pattern. Still, Brown captures the investigative logic: serial murder is not only about tallying bodies but about temporally separated acts linked by an offenders internal motivations and methods.
Her phrasing also reflects cultural assumptions. Using his mirrors the reality that most known serial killers are male, yet it elides female and nonbinary offenders and reinforces a stereotype that can blind investigators to atypical patterns. The number threshold itself is a heuristic, not a universal legal standard, and the media often uses the label loosely, blurring distinctions with mass shootings or spree killings.
Why definitions matter is practical. Labels shape how agencies allocate resources, whether they link cases across jurisdictions, and how the public perceives risk. Emphasizing the cooling off period invites investigators to look for behavioral signatures, fantasy escalation, and planning, rather than focusing only on counts, and it cautions against sensationalism by grounding the term in criminological structure.
The field has evolved. The FBI shifted in the mid-2000s to a broader definition of two or more victims in separate events, generally with a cooling off period. That change was meant to improve early detection and avoid waiting for a third victim before recognizing a pattern. Still, Brown captures the investigative logic: serial murder is not only about tallying bodies but about temporally separated acts linked by an offenders internal motivations and methods.
Her phrasing also reflects cultural assumptions. Using his mirrors the reality that most known serial killers are male, yet it elides female and nonbinary offenders and reinforces a stereotype that can blind investigators to atypical patterns. The number threshold itself is a heuristic, not a universal legal standard, and the media often uses the label loosely, blurring distinctions with mass shootings or spree killings.
Why definitions matter is practical. Labels shape how agencies allocate resources, whether they link cases across jurisdictions, and how the public perceives risk. Emphasizing the cooling off period invites investigators to look for behavioral signatures, fantasy escalation, and planning, rather than focusing only on counts, and it cautions against sensationalism by grounding the term in criminological structure.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Pat
Add to List
