"The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense"
About this Quote
Tom Clancy, architect of the modern techno-thriller, puts his finger on a paradox of storytelling. Reality simply unfolds, indifferent to patterns or plausibility. Fiction, by contrast, must persuade. A novel or film invites an implicit contract with its audience: events will follow a recognizable logic, causes will lead to effects, and details will pay off. When that contract is breached with coincidences, arbitrary turns, or unexplained miracles, readers feel cheated.
The demand for sense is not the same as a demand for realism. A fantasy about dragons can feel more convincing than a documentary if its world obeys its own rules. Internal coherence matters more than mimetic accuracy. Aristotle called this the preference for the probable impossible over the improbable possible; a story can ask for big imaginative leaps as long as those leaps land on stable ground. That is why Chekhovs gun remains a shorthand for narrative economy: if you show something, it should matter. Reality is under no such compulsion, and most of what happens in a day is loose thread.
Clancys own work, with its meticulous hardware and procedural detail, thrives on engineered plausibility. The research supports a chain of causation that feels inevitable once revealed. Yet anyone who follows geopolitics knows that real-world outcomes are jagged, riddled with accidents, and often stranger than any plot. Fiction cannot hide behind randomness because audiences bring expectation and hindsight; they look for pattern and purpose, even in chaos.
The line also nods to the psychology of reading. Humans are pattern-seeking creatures who find comfort in narrative coherence, especially when the real world refuses to provide it. Making sense is both craft and solace: the imposition of meaning on contingency. Clancys quip is thus a witty dismissal of naive realism and a craft lesson for storytellers. Make it make sense, not because life does, but precisely because it does not.
The demand for sense is not the same as a demand for realism. A fantasy about dragons can feel more convincing than a documentary if its world obeys its own rules. Internal coherence matters more than mimetic accuracy. Aristotle called this the preference for the probable impossible over the improbable possible; a story can ask for big imaginative leaps as long as those leaps land on stable ground. That is why Chekhovs gun remains a shorthand for narrative economy: if you show something, it should matter. Reality is under no such compulsion, and most of what happens in a day is loose thread.
Clancys own work, with its meticulous hardware and procedural detail, thrives on engineered plausibility. The research supports a chain of causation that feels inevitable once revealed. Yet anyone who follows geopolitics knows that real-world outcomes are jagged, riddled with accidents, and often stranger than any plot. Fiction cannot hide behind randomness because audiences bring expectation and hindsight; they look for pattern and purpose, even in chaos.
The line also nods to the psychology of reading. Humans are pattern-seeking creatures who find comfort in narrative coherence, especially when the real world refuses to provide it. Making sense is both craft and solace: the imposition of meaning on contingency. Clancys quip is thus a witty dismissal of naive realism and a craft lesson for storytellers. Make it make sense, not because life does, but precisely because it does not.
Quote Details
| Topic | Witty One-Liners |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List
