"The difference between the men and the boys in politics is, and always has been, that the boys want to be something, while the men want to do something"

In Eric Sevareid's quote, the distinction between "guys" and "boys" in politics focuses on maturity and intent, instead of age or gender. Sevareid recommends that true political maturity depends on the aspiration to enact meaningful change, instead of merely looking for status or power.

The "young boys" in politics represent people driven by ego and individual aspiration. They are more thinking about how the title or position of power raises their status and satisfies their individual goals. Their desire "to be something" shows a self-indulgent approach, where the focus is on individual tradition, fame, or the advantages that accompany a prominent role. This contrasts dramatically with the deeper, intrinsic inspiration to affect favorable modification, which is the hallmark of political maturity.

On the other hand, the "men" in politics, based on Sevareid's metaphor, signify those who are encouraged by an inner voice and purpose. Their goal "to do something" shows a commitment to civil service and a desire to make a concrete distinction in society. These people view political office as a platform to promote for causes, carry out policies, or address societal issues. Their focus is external, oriented toward results that benefit the community, nation, or even the world, instead of personal gain.

Sevareid's observation highlights a vital examination of political intent, recommending that the efficiency and integrity of leaders depend heavily on their motivations. Leaders who are concentrated on doing something are likely to focus on public interest over personal gain, promoting trust and respect from their constituents. This difference likewise indicates that political maturity involves recognizing the duties of management and being driven by a vision for societal improvement.

In conclusion, Sevareid's quote difficulties aiming politicians to introspect on their inspirations and to strive for the maturity that prioritizes action and effect over individual ambition. It acts as a timeless suggestion that the true measure of a political figure lies not in the titles they hold, but in the changes they inspire.