"The judicial system is the most expensive machine ever invented for finding out what happened and what to do about it"

Irving R. Kaufman's quote, "The judicial system is the most expensive machine ever invented for learning what happened and what to do about it", uses a vital reflection on the complexities and costs related to the legal system. At its core, the quote acknowledges the double function of the judiciary: fact-finding and resolution. Kaufman highlights the comprehensive resources required for the judicial system to meet these roles, emphasizing its fundamental complexity and expenditure.

The expression "most pricey maker" recommends that the judicial system is a huge and detailed entity, similar to a maker, that requires significant monetary investment to operate. This investment includes the expenses of keeping court centers, paying wages for judges, attorneys, and court workers, and financing various administrative procedures. Such a description implies that despite the high costs, the judicial system stays an essential tool for preserving order and justice within society. It also highlights the concept that justice, while an essential societal value, requires a significant economic commitment.

Kaufman's metaphor of a "device" might also allude to the systematic and procedural nature of the judicial system. Like a maker, the judicial system operates through developed guidelines and processes, such as proof event, witness evaluation, and legal argumentation, all focused on revealing the truth and figuring out appropriate outcomes. Nevertheless, this metaphor might likewise recommend a particular rigidness and impersonality within the system, highlighting the difficulties of balancing procedural requirements with the requirement for equitable and simply outcomes.

Moreover, the quote implicitly raises concerns about the efficiency and availability of the justice system. The high expenses connected with its operation can cause barriers for individuals looking for justice, possibly resulting in unequal access to legal resources and representation. This variation can affect the system's capability to efficiently "find out what occurred" and "what to do about it", particularly for marginalized groups.

Overall, Kaufman's quote invites reflection on the worth and difficulties of the judicial system, motivating an ongoing dialogue about how to stabilize its necessary functions with issues about cost, efficiency, and ease of access.