"The point I am making is that in the more primitive forms of society the individual is merely a unit; in more developed forms of society he is an independent personality"

Herbert Read's quote contrasts the role and identity of the person in primitive versus more developed societies. At its core, the statement suggests that as societies progress, the position and understanding of the specific changes considerably.

In primitive societies, Read presumes that the person is mostly viewed as a system. This suggests that the person's identity and worth are mainly soaked up within the cumulative. Their roles and functions are specified by the requirements of the neighborhood, and there is restricted space for individual expression or individuality. In such societies, the structure typically focuses on survival, common activities, and shared resources. The strength and resilience of the group exceed the desires or goals of any single member. The person's contributions are measured by how well they serve the collective interests.

In contrast, as societies become more established, Read argues that individuals start to emerge as independent personalities. With social development typically comes increased complexity in social structures, economic systems, and cultural practices. This intricacy creates space for individuals to check out personal identities, ambitions, and talents. People are motivated to establish unique characters, pursue personal objectives, and contribute to society in diverse methods. The value of the individual extends beyond their performance within the group; it incorporates individual achievements, developments, and the capability for self-expression.

This shift can be attributed to several elements connected with societal development, such as technological advancements, increased economic opportunities, and more robust institutions that protect individual rights and liberties. Education, too, plays an essential function in cultivating individual development and crucial thinking, additional advancing the concept of individualism.

Read's observation invites reflection on the balance in between neighborhood cohesion and specific autonomy. It recommends that while modern societies may provide greater freedom for individual development, they ought to also remain alert in keeping a sense of neighborhood and shared purpose to make sure that individualism does not lead to seclusion or social fragmentation.