"The politician in my country seeks votes, affection and respect, in that order. With few notable exceptions, they are simply men who want to be loved"
About this Quote
Edward R. Murrow distills a hard lesson about democratic politics into a spare hierarchy: votes, affection, respect. Votes come first because they are the currency of power; without them, nothing else matters. Affection follows because it fuels votes, softening scrutiny and making transgression forgivable. Respect, the most demanding and least transactional of the three, arrives last, if at all. The sequence exposes incentives that shape behavior. If survival depends on winning the next election, then pleasing beats persuading, and the pursuit of approval eclipses the pursuit of principle.
Calling politicians men who want to be loved is both psychological diagnosis and media critique. Murrow worked at the dawn of television, when image began to eclipse argument and the candidate became a character on a screen. Television could elevate charm over substance and convert public life into a contest for attention. In such a marketplace, the hunger to be loved is not a personal flaw so much as an occupational hazard. It means courting applause, smoothing edges, avoiding the lonely positions that build respect but risk affection and votes.
The small caveat — few notable exceptions — matters. Murrow leaves room for statesmanship, for those who choose respect over love by telling unpleasant truths, by absorbing short-term loss for long-term good. He knew from confronting McCarthy that courage is rarely crowd-pleasing. Yet he also suggests that the culture surrounding politics, including journalism, either rewards or punishes such choices. If the public demands entertainment and affirmation, the performers will provide it.
The observation is not purely cynical. It invites a reciprocal responsibility. Citizens who want leaders they can respect must reward candor, tolerance for nuance, and decisions that may sting before they serve. Otherwise, the system will continue to select for those most adept at seeking love, and love, as Murrow implies, is fickle. Respect is earned slowly and usually at a cost; democracies get the balance they incentivize.
Calling politicians men who want to be loved is both psychological diagnosis and media critique. Murrow worked at the dawn of television, when image began to eclipse argument and the candidate became a character on a screen. Television could elevate charm over substance and convert public life into a contest for attention. In such a marketplace, the hunger to be loved is not a personal flaw so much as an occupational hazard. It means courting applause, smoothing edges, avoiding the lonely positions that build respect but risk affection and votes.
The small caveat — few notable exceptions — matters. Murrow leaves room for statesmanship, for those who choose respect over love by telling unpleasant truths, by absorbing short-term loss for long-term good. He knew from confronting McCarthy that courage is rarely crowd-pleasing. Yet he also suggests that the culture surrounding politics, including journalism, either rewards or punishes such choices. If the public demands entertainment and affirmation, the performers will provide it.
The observation is not purely cynical. It invites a reciprocal responsibility. Citizens who want leaders they can respect must reward candor, tolerance for nuance, and decisions that may sting before they serve. Otherwise, the system will continue to select for those most adept at seeking love, and love, as Murrow implies, is fickle. Respect is earned slowly and usually at a cost; democracies get the balance they incentivize.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Edward
Add to List
