"The present structure of rewards in high schools produces a response on the part of an adolescent social system which effectively impedes the process of education"
About this Quote
A sociologist’s version of a mic drop: school isn’t failing kids by accident, it’s paying them to fail in a very particular way. Coleman’s phrasing is clinical on purpose. “Present structure of rewards” doesn’t mean cash; it means status, belonging, and the tiny social economies that decide who counts. He’s pointing at a basic design flaw: adults build one incentive system (grades, college track, “achievement”), while adolescents run another (coolness, loyalty, not looking like a teacher’s pet). When those systems clash, peer culture doesn’t just distract from learning; it actively punishes it.
The key move is that Coleman blames “an adolescent social system,” not individual students. That shifts the story from morality (lazy teens) to ecology (rational behavior inside a group). If the social rewards go to the kid who performs indifference, then effort becomes reputationally expensive. Education gets “impeded” not by a lack of information or resources but by a predictable feedback loop: the more schools emphasize certain markers of success, the more teenage culture invents counter-markers to protect group identity.
The context matters: Coleman wrote in the shadow of postwar mass schooling and the data-driven turn in education research, when policymakers wanted simple levers to pull. His warning is that the lever isn’t just curriculum or funding; it’s the social payoff matrix inside the building. Change the rewards, or the building’s real managers - the peer network - will keep rewriting the rules.
The key move is that Coleman blames “an adolescent social system,” not individual students. That shifts the story from morality (lazy teens) to ecology (rational behavior inside a group). If the social rewards go to the kid who performs indifference, then effort becomes reputationally expensive. Education gets “impeded” not by a lack of information or resources but by a predictable feedback loop: the more schools emphasize certain markers of success, the more teenage culture invents counter-markers to protect group identity.
The context matters: Coleman wrote in the shadow of postwar mass schooling and the data-driven turn in education research, when policymakers wanted simple levers to pull. His warning is that the lever isn’t just curriculum or funding; it’s the social payoff matrix inside the building. Change the rewards, or the building’s real managers - the peer network - will keep rewriting the rules.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
