"The sublimity of administration consists in knowing the proper degree of power that should be exerted on different occasions"
About this Quote
Administration, to Montesquieu, isn’t the dull paperwork of governance; it’s the high art of restraint. Calling it “sublimity” is a provocation: the grandeur of power lies not in its volume but in its calibration. The line flatters the technocrat and warns the tyrant in the same breath. It suggests that the true test of a state isn’t whether it can act, but whether it can stop itself from acting when action would corrode legitimacy.
The key phrase is “proper degree.” Montesquieu smuggles a whole political philosophy into that modest metric. Power is treated like a dosage: too little and the body politic fails; too much and it becomes poison. This is the Enlightenment’s signature move, swapping divine-right certainty for measured judgment, and it’s also a subtle rebuke to absolutism. In an age when French monarchy could mistake force for order, “knowing” becomes a moral and institutional skill, not mere cleverness. Wisdom here is procedural, almost ecological: governance as balance, not conquest.
The subtext is that administration is situational, and therefore dangerous in the wrong hands. If everything depends on “occasions,” then discretion becomes the battlefield where liberty can be preserved or quietly strangled. That’s why Montesquieu’s broader project matters: separating powers, building checks, designing a system where no one person gets to decide the “proper degree” alone. Sublimity, in other words, is not a vibe; it’s a constitutional discipline.
The key phrase is “proper degree.” Montesquieu smuggles a whole political philosophy into that modest metric. Power is treated like a dosage: too little and the body politic fails; too much and it becomes poison. This is the Enlightenment’s signature move, swapping divine-right certainty for measured judgment, and it’s also a subtle rebuke to absolutism. In an age when French monarchy could mistake force for order, “knowing” becomes a moral and institutional skill, not mere cleverness. Wisdom here is procedural, almost ecological: governance as balance, not conquest.
The subtext is that administration is situational, and therefore dangerous in the wrong hands. If everything depends on “occasions,” then discretion becomes the battlefield where liberty can be preserved or quietly strangled. That’s why Montesquieu’s broader project matters: separating powers, building checks, designing a system where no one person gets to decide the “proper degree” alone. Sublimity, in other words, is not a vibe; it’s a constitutional discipline.
Quote Details
| Topic | Management |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Charles
Add to List





