"The Upper Bohemia people wore tuxedos in an art gallery, and Lower Bohemia was all of us"

David Amram's quote "The Upper Bohemia individuals used tuxedos in an art gallery, and Lower Bohemia was all of us" encapsulates a poignant commentary on social divisions and cultural identities. Through this quote, Amram gives us a glance into a particular social landscape identified by two unique groups: the "Upper Bohemia" and "Lower Bohemia."

"Upper Bohemia" refers to the elite, cultured class, often connected with wealth and sophistication, who regular highbrow locations such as art galleries, wearing standard signs of status and respectability like tuxedos. This group's way of life is rooted in a mix of art and abundance, typically taking part in the patronage of the arts while preserving a sense of exclusivity and improvement.

In contrast, "Lower Bohemia" represents a broader, more inclusive identity-- "everybody", as Amram states-- symbolizing the collective spirit of those who perhaps live more easily, declining traditional standards and classifications. This group welcomes diversity and imagination but without the pretenses that can accompany material wealth and social status. "Lower Bohemia" is portrayed as a community unified not by luxury, but by a shared humankind, varied experiences, and perhaps a countercultural values.

Amram's choice of words lights up the nuances in between these two worlds. While the Upper Bohemia might symbolize a classically defined 'high society', Lower Bohemia resonates with openness, credibility, and a sense of solidarity amongst individuals irrespective of their socioeconomic status.

Therefore, the quote subtly critiques the noticeable and undetectable barriers that typically different individuals. It challenges us to rethink our preconceived notions about culture and class. Amram suggests that the real creative and cultural life-- dynamic, vibrant, and inclusive-- beats more robustly in Lower Bohemia, where creativity and community overthrow pomp and circumstance. Through this lens, his statement is both an event of the underrepresented and a require unity beyond social stratification.