"The U.S. government knew that China wanted to acquire sensitive U.S. technology, and instead of implementing a policy to prevent them from acquiring the information, the government all but gave them an invitation to take our equipment and designs"

In this quote, Charles Foster Bass, a previous U.S. Congressman, is revealing issue about the viewed insufficiencies or failures in the U.S. federal government's handling of national security when it concerns delicate technology. The statement recommends that despite understanding China's interest in getting advanced U.S. technology, the government failed to take efficient preventative measures.

The phrase "knew that China wished to obtain delicate U.S. technology" suggests that there was clear intelligence or proof pointing toward China's intentions. This sets the phase for the expectation that the U.S. need to have enacted policies or measures targeted at safeguarding such innovations from being acquired by foreign entities that might be potential foes.

The latter part of the quote, "rather of executing a policy to prevent them ... the federal government all however provided an invite", is a review of the U.S. federal government's actions (or do not have thereof). It recommends neglect or a substantial lapse in safeguarding national security interests. Bass is most likely indicating either ineffective regulative structures, lax enforcement, or inadequate strategic oversight. The hyperbolic language--"provided an invitation"-- communicates a sense of disappointment and seriousness, highlighting the gravity of potential security breaches and the perceived ease with which China might access sensitive innovations.

The implications of this statement are profound. It not just underscores issues about nationwide security and technological espionage but likewise casts doubt on the competence and top priorities of the entities responsible for safeguarding crucial technologies. There is an underlying call for responsibility and reform, prompting the U.S. government to adopt more strict steps to defend against unapproved access to crucial technological info that might potentially undermine U.S. competitive and security advantages on the global phase. This quote acts as a stark suggestion of the complex interaction in between worldwide relations, nationwide security, and technological innovation in a globalized world.