"The writer of originality, unless dead, is always shocking, scandalous; novelty disturbs and repels"

Simone de Beauvoir's quote, "The writer of creativity, unless dead, is always shocking, scandalous; novelty disturbs and wards off", provides a reflection on society's typically ambivalent relationship with initial idea and innovation. In this declaration, de Beauvoir underscores a paradox: genuine imagination and pioneering concepts frequently disrupt the status quo, challenging accepted norms and beliefs. The shock and scandal related to originality emerge due to the fact that new ideas threaten traditional thinking and comfort zones, creating discomfort or even hostility.

De Beauvoir recommends that society typically discovers it easier to celebrate creativity posthumously, once the author or thinker is no longer perceived as a threat to existing norms. The adjective "dead" suggests that, in death, an initial thinker's ideas are more secure to absorb; they have been filtered through time, examined, and maybe thinned down so they no longer posture an immediate obstacle. The preliminary words and ideas have actually been absorbed into society, rendering them less controversial and more palatable. The improvement of once-revolutionary ideas into accepted fact highlights this dynamic.

The words "novelty interrupts and pushes back" highlight that originalities inherently provoke discomfort. This discomfort arises from fear of the unknown and the human tendency to withstand modification. Novelty forces reconsideration of established practices and beliefs, pressing people and societies out of their convenience zones. As such, those who bring creativity are frequently met resistance while they are living and active within their field.

De Beauvoir's insight is a suggestion of the guts needed to be a pioneer. Writers, artists, and thinkers must frequently stand up to social rejection and scandal in their pursuit of reality and innovation. It welcomes reflection on how we might quicker accept novelty and originality, acknowledging the capacity for growth and improvement rather of recoiling in fear. The quote motivates us to question our preliminary responses to originalities and to stay open up to the evolving landscape of human thought and creativity.