"There are many examples in high schools which show something about the effects such competition might have"
About this Quote
James S. Coleman points to high schools because they make the effects of competition visible in daily routines and in the culture that forms around adolescents. He studied how institutional rules and peer norms interact, and he saw schools as a laboratory where competition is organized, rewarded, and internalized. Grading curves, honor rolls, varsity tryouts, class rankings, selective tracks, and college admissions all create contests that shape what students value and how they behave.
Competition can energize effort and clarify goals. When academic achievement is publicly recognized, students often respond with greater diligence, and teachers can align instruction to higher standards. Athletic and extracurricular contests build commitment, teamwork, and persistence. Yet Coleman also emphasized the social side effects: competition sorts students into visible hierarchies that can harden into social distance. The winners receive reinforcement, while those repeatedly labeled as lower performing withdraw, avoid risk, or seek alternative status arenas. Peer groups then enforce norms that may privilege popularity or athletic prowess over scholarship, a dynamic he documented in The Adolescent Society.
He also traced competition beyond individuals to institutions. When schools compete for students, as with magnet programs or private alternatives, administrators gain incentives to improve curricula and climate. But these systems can induce cream skimming, amplify segregation by ability or family background, and weaken the common culture that supports learning, especially for students who rely on collective norms and adult oversight. This insight foreshadows his later work on social capital: competitive structures are most beneficial when embedded in strong communities that transmit academic expectations and provide support, as he argued in studies of Catholic schools.
The lesson is not that competition is good or bad in itself, but that its design and surrounding social fabric determine its effects. High schools reveal both faces at once: heightened motivation and achievement for some, alienation and narrowed values for others, depending on how the contests are set and what the community chooses to honor.
Competition can energize effort and clarify goals. When academic achievement is publicly recognized, students often respond with greater diligence, and teachers can align instruction to higher standards. Athletic and extracurricular contests build commitment, teamwork, and persistence. Yet Coleman also emphasized the social side effects: competition sorts students into visible hierarchies that can harden into social distance. The winners receive reinforcement, while those repeatedly labeled as lower performing withdraw, avoid risk, or seek alternative status arenas. Peer groups then enforce norms that may privilege popularity or athletic prowess over scholarship, a dynamic he documented in The Adolescent Society.
He also traced competition beyond individuals to institutions. When schools compete for students, as with magnet programs or private alternatives, administrators gain incentives to improve curricula and climate. But these systems can induce cream skimming, amplify segregation by ability or family background, and weaken the common culture that supports learning, especially for students who rely on collective norms and adult oversight. This insight foreshadows his later work on social capital: competitive structures are most beneficial when embedded in strong communities that transmit academic expectations and provide support, as he argued in studies of Catholic schools.
The lesson is not that competition is good or bad in itself, but that its design and surrounding social fabric determine its effects. High schools reveal both faces at once: heightened motivation and achievement for some, alienation and narrowed values for others, depending on how the contests are set and what the community chooses to honor.
Quote Details
| Topic | Student |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
