"There are no absolute rules of conduct, either in peace or war. Everything depends on circumstances"
About this Quote
Trotsky isn’t offering moral nuance so much as granting himself a blank check. “No absolute rules” reads like a coolheaded realist’s shrug, but in the mouth of a revolutionary it’s a doctrine of permission: history is moving, the stakes are total, and any fixed code becomes an obstacle to victory. The line’s craft is its calm. By pairing “peace or war,” he flattens the usual distinction liberals cling to - the idea that wartime is the exception and peacetime the norm. Trotsky implies the exception is permanent, because politics is permanent struggle.
“Everything depends on circumstances” also functions as a rebuttal to rivals on Trotsky’s left and right. Against moralists, it says: you can’t judge us with tidy principles. Against dogmatists, it says: the revolution can’t be run by scripture, even Marxist scripture; tactics must flex with conditions. That dual edge mirrors Trotsky’s own career as an organizer and strategist, from the improvisations of 1905 to the brutal logistics of building the Red Army during civil war.
The subtext is consequential and chilling: if circumstances are the judge, then power gets to define circumstances. It’s an argument that makes sense inside emergencies - famine, invasion, counterrevolution - but it’s also how emergencies get extended indefinitely. Trotsky frames contingency as honesty, yet the rhetorical move launders hard choices into “necessity,” turning political violence into something like weather: regrettable, unavoidable, and therefore unaccountable.
“Everything depends on circumstances” also functions as a rebuttal to rivals on Trotsky’s left and right. Against moralists, it says: you can’t judge us with tidy principles. Against dogmatists, it says: the revolution can’t be run by scripture, even Marxist scripture; tactics must flex with conditions. That dual edge mirrors Trotsky’s own career as an organizer and strategist, from the improvisations of 1905 to the brutal logistics of building the Red Army during civil war.
The subtext is consequential and chilling: if circumstances are the judge, then power gets to define circumstances. It’s an argument that makes sense inside emergencies - famine, invasion, counterrevolution - but it’s also how emergencies get extended indefinitely. Trotsky frames contingency as honesty, yet the rhetorical move launders hard choices into “necessity,” turning political violence into something like weather: regrettable, unavoidable, and therefore unaccountable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|
More Quotes by Leon
Add to List








