"There has been so much power concentrated. There is no leash on that power anymore and Americans face the situation that this power is getting momentum with each passing year with each presidency"

James Bovard's quote is an important examination of the evolution of political power in the United States. He suggests that power has actually ended up being increasingly centralized within the federal government, to an extent where conventional checks and balances may no longer effectively restrain it. By stating, "There is no leash on that power any longer," Bovard raises concerns about the disintegration of systems that are created to restrict governmental authority and to ensure responsibility. This expression suggests a prospective drift towards a more authoritarian type of governance, where power is exercised without appropriate oversight or accountability.

The quote even more stresses that "Americans deal with the scenario that this power is getting momentum with each passing year with each presidency." Here, Bovard highlights a pattern of growing executive power that seems to heighten with each successive administration-- no matter political celebration. This observation may be analyzed as a critique of the increasing pattern of presidents to expand their impact, often at the cost of legislative and judicial branches. This growth in power might be attributed to various elements consisting of nationwide security concerns, economic obstacles, or social issues that need decisive action, typically resulting in the expansion of executive authority through legislation or executive orders.

Bovard's statement acts as a warning about the possible risks of uncontrolled power and concentration of authority within the executive branch. It advises people to be watchful about the balance of power and the protecting of democratic principles. In a wider context, Bovard's quote motivates a reflection on the significance of civic engagement and the requirement for institutional reforms that ensure power is not just concentrated but worked out in a manner that stays transparent, responsible, and in line with the foundational suitables of democracy.