"There's an old maxim that says, 'Things that work persist,' which is why there's still Cobol floating around"
About this Quote
Vinton Cerf's quote, "There's an old maxim that states, 'Things that work continue,' which is why there's still COBOL drifting around", encapsulates a basic principle of technological and systems evolution. At its core, the statement suggests that systems, innovations, or procedures that show dependable and effective continue to be used long after their beginning. This perseverance is due to their dependability and the crucial functions they play within existing infrastructures.
COBOL (Common Business-Oriented Language) exemplifies this maxim. Developed in the late 1950s and early 1960s, COBOL was designed for company, finance, and administrative systems. Despite being viewed as an outdated innovation by some contemporary standards, it remains omnipresent in legacy systems worldwide, specifically within government and monetary sectors. The factor COBOL persists is its tested performance history of stability and effectiveness in executing complex, transaction-heavy procedures, which are vital for the operations of massive organizations.
When Cerf points out "Things that work persist", he's emphasizing the trust and reliability implanted in recognized technologies. Regardless of advancements in programming languages and systems, replacing such innovations is not just expensive however also risky. Transitioning to modern-day systems may provide new capabilities and streamline procedures, however it likewise includes considerable resource investment and potential operational interruptions.
Moreover, Cerf's declaration carries a broader implication about technological advancement. It highlights how innovation does not necessarily relate to instant replacement or obsolescence of older systems. Instead, it typically causes coexistence, where old and new technologies work together, complementing each other.
In essence, Cerf points to a practical approach toward technology management. The durability of systems like COBOL is testament to their reliable efficiency and the inherent caution companies exercise when thinking about upgrading foundational elements of their functional environments. These sustaining systems, like COBOL, are reminders of a pragmatic concept: if it isn't broken, there's little reason to fix it.
More details
About the Author