"These wealthy people were very interested in contemporary music. They wanted to help diffuse it and get it to be known to other people"
About this Quote
Carter points to a quiet engine behind the story of modern music: patronage that believed the new deserved oxygen. Contemporary music, especially the thornier strains Carter championed, rarely thrives on ticket sales alone. It demands rehearsal time, specialized performers, and audiences willing to sit with unfamiliar sounds. Wealthy listeners who cared about the art form stepped in not to hoard it but to spread it, underwriting commissions, concerts, publications, and recordings so that ideas could travel beyond a rarefied circle.
The verb diffuse matters. He suggests a broad dispersal, like light through a prism, where support breaks the beam into multiple pathways: chamber series, library concerts, university residencies, radio broadcasts, and later, LPs and festivals. In the United States, legacies of figures such as Elizabeth Sprague Coolidge, Serge Koussevitzky, and Paul Fromm show how targeted philanthropy built durable infrastructure for the unfamiliar. A commission buys a composer time. An endowed concert series normalizes premieres. A foundation-funded recording lets listeners return to difficult works until patterns and drama emerge.
Carter knew both sides of this exchange. His music, with its metric modulations and densely argued forms, required faith from performers and patience from audiences. Without backing that absorbed financial risk, it could have remained a private language. The irony he acknowledges is productive: elite resources used not to seal off taste but to circulate it. That top-down route sits uneasily with democratic ideals, yet it often creates the conditions for grassroots appreciation by subsidizing access and repetition.
The statement also marks a historical moment when American cultural confidence rose after World War II. Universities expanded, orchestras professionalized, and philanthropic networks matured. Contemporary music became a public project rather than a solitary experiment. Carter credits those who understood that vanguard art needs conduits. Their belief transformed difficult sounds into a shared repertoire, not by diluting them, but by giving them the time and space to become legible to others.
The verb diffuse matters. He suggests a broad dispersal, like light through a prism, where support breaks the beam into multiple pathways: chamber series, library concerts, university residencies, radio broadcasts, and later, LPs and festivals. In the United States, legacies of figures such as Elizabeth Sprague Coolidge, Serge Koussevitzky, and Paul Fromm show how targeted philanthropy built durable infrastructure for the unfamiliar. A commission buys a composer time. An endowed concert series normalizes premieres. A foundation-funded recording lets listeners return to difficult works until patterns and drama emerge.
Carter knew both sides of this exchange. His music, with its metric modulations and densely argued forms, required faith from performers and patience from audiences. Without backing that absorbed financial risk, it could have remained a private language. The irony he acknowledges is productive: elite resources used not to seal off taste but to circulate it. That top-down route sits uneasily with democratic ideals, yet it often creates the conditions for grassroots appreciation by subsidizing access and repetition.
The statement also marks a historical moment when American cultural confidence rose after World War II. Universities expanded, orchestras professionalized, and philanthropic networks matured. Contemporary music became a public project rather than a solitary experiment. Carter credits those who understood that vanguard art needs conduits. Their belief transformed difficult sounds into a shared repertoire, not by diluting them, but by giving them the time and space to become legible to others.
Quote Details
| Topic | Music |
|---|
More Quotes by Elliott
Add to List
