"Thinking in generations also means enabling our young to have a decent standard of living"
About this Quote
Thinking across generations is not a sentimental impulse about legacy; it is a concrete test of whether policies today widen or narrow the path for those who come next. Paul Tsongas, a fiscally minded Democrat and early 1990s presidential contender, pressed that point when he argued that stewardship includes ensuring that the young can actually afford to build a life. He cut against a politics of immediacy, where short-term gains and easy promises crowd out patient investments and responsible trade-offs.
The phrase decent standard of living grounds lofty rhetoric in everyday realities: stable work with rising wages, attainable housing, affordable education and health care, clean air and water, and a sense that effort will be rewarded with mobility. Tsongas linked that horizon to fiscal choices. Mounting public debt, he warned, can siphon resources from such investments, stoke higher interest costs, and crowd out private and public capital formation that future workers will need. But he was not arguing for austerity as an end in itself. The point was to husband resources wisely so they could be directed to long-run drivers of prosperity: education, research, infrastructure, and a healthy environment.
Thinking in generations therefore demands two disciplines at once. It restrains the temptation to push costs forward through unchecked borrowing or environmental depletion. And it insists on spending where it yields compounding benefits for the young, rather than symbolic gestures that leave underlying constraints untouched. The moral claim is also a practical one: a society that consigns its youth to stagnation cannot sustain social trust, innovation, or democratic stability.
Seen that way, enabling a decent standard of living becomes the litmus test of intergenerational justice. If public choices today do not lower barriers and expand opportunity for the young, then talk of legacy is hollow. Real stewardship shows up in the affordability and possibilities of ordinary life for the next generation.
The phrase decent standard of living grounds lofty rhetoric in everyday realities: stable work with rising wages, attainable housing, affordable education and health care, clean air and water, and a sense that effort will be rewarded with mobility. Tsongas linked that horizon to fiscal choices. Mounting public debt, he warned, can siphon resources from such investments, stoke higher interest costs, and crowd out private and public capital formation that future workers will need. But he was not arguing for austerity as an end in itself. The point was to husband resources wisely so they could be directed to long-run drivers of prosperity: education, research, infrastructure, and a healthy environment.
Thinking in generations therefore demands two disciplines at once. It restrains the temptation to push costs forward through unchecked borrowing or environmental depletion. And it insists on spending where it yields compounding benefits for the young, rather than symbolic gestures that leave underlying constraints untouched. The moral claim is also a practical one: a society that consigns its youth to stagnation cannot sustain social trust, innovation, or democratic stability.
Seen that way, enabling a decent standard of living becomes the litmus test of intergenerational justice. If public choices today do not lower barriers and expand opportunity for the young, then talk of legacy is hollow. Real stewardship shows up in the affordability and possibilities of ordinary life for the next generation.
Quote Details
| Topic | Youth |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List
