"Thus a man was born into a fixed relation to certain gods as surely as he was born into a relation to his fellow-men; and his religion... was simply one side of the general scheme of conduct prescribed for him by his position as a member of society"
About this Quote
Smith’s sentence has the cool audacity of a scientist flattening religion into sociology without quite saying the quiet part out loud. Born “into a fixed relation to certain gods” is a deliberately unromantic phrasing: the gods function less as private revelations than as inherited coordinates, as predictable as kinship ties. The move is subtle but surgical. By pairing gods with “fellow-men,” Smith yokes the sacred to the social, implying that belief isn’t primarily an inner conviction but a public fact - a role you occupy before you ever choose it.
The key word is “prescribed.” Religion here is not a free-floating set of doctrines but a rulebook embedded in status: tribe, class, clan, gender, office. Smith’s “general scheme of conduct” reads like an early anthropological demystification, aimed at Victorian readers who liked to imagine religion as either pure theology or pure feeling. He insists on something more constrained: religious practice as civic habit, enforced by the same pressures that enforce etiquette, law, and loyalty. That ellipsis after “religion...” does work, too, hinting at a longer argument where sentiment and metaphysics get politely sidelined.
Context matters. Writing in the late 19th century, Smith helped pioneer comparative religion, studying ritual and communal life in ancient Semitic cultures. His provocation lands in a Protestant modernity that prized individual faith: if religion is “one side” of social conduct, then the modern fantasy of purely personal belief starts to look less timeless - and more like a recent cultural arrangement.
The key word is “prescribed.” Religion here is not a free-floating set of doctrines but a rulebook embedded in status: tribe, class, clan, gender, office. Smith’s “general scheme of conduct” reads like an early anthropological demystification, aimed at Victorian readers who liked to imagine religion as either pure theology or pure feeling. He insists on something more constrained: religious practice as civic habit, enforced by the same pressures that enforce etiquette, law, and loyalty. That ellipsis after “religion...” does work, too, hinting at a longer argument where sentiment and metaphysics get politely sidelined.
Context matters. Writing in the late 19th century, Smith helped pioneer comparative religion, studying ritual and communal life in ancient Semitic cultures. His provocation lands in a Protestant modernity that prized individual faith: if religion is “one side” of social conduct, then the modern fantasy of purely personal belief starts to look less timeless - and more like a recent cultural arrangement.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by William
Add to List







