"To disagree, one doesn't have to be disagreeable"
About this Quote
Goldwater’s line is a small piece of rhetorical jujitsu: it turns the heat of conflict into a claim of character. Coming from the patron saint of modern American conservatism, it’s not a plea for mushy centrism so much as an argument about rules of engagement. Disagreement is framed as legitimate, even necessary; “disagreeable” is the optional sin, the childish extra. The sentence creates a moral hierarchy where the act of opposing someone is neutral, but the manner of doing it is the true test of adulthood.
The subtext is strategic. Goldwater knew politics is a contact sport, and he was often painted as an extremist or a brawler. This maxim offers a preemptive defense: I can fight you on substance without being your enemy. It’s also a quiet rebuke to a style of politics that relies on humiliation and personal contempt as a shortcut to persuasion. By separating ideas from temperament, he gives his side a way to argue hard while still claiming the higher ground.
Context matters because Goldwater’s brand of conservatism was insurgent in the mid-century Republican Party, skeptical of consensus and suspicious of liberal dominance. The line works because it reassures the anxious listener: dissent doesn’t have to mean social rupture. It’s a civility pitch that doesn’t ask anyone to stop believing what they believe; it asks them to stop turning belief into theater. And in a political culture that rewards performance, that’s a surprisingly sharp constraint.
The subtext is strategic. Goldwater knew politics is a contact sport, and he was often painted as an extremist or a brawler. This maxim offers a preemptive defense: I can fight you on substance without being your enemy. It’s also a quiet rebuke to a style of politics that relies on humiliation and personal contempt as a shortcut to persuasion. By separating ideas from temperament, he gives his side a way to argue hard while still claiming the higher ground.
Context matters because Goldwater’s brand of conservatism was insurgent in the mid-century Republican Party, skeptical of consensus and suspicious of liberal dominance. The line works because it reassures the anxious listener: dissent doesn’t have to mean social rupture. It’s a civility pitch that doesn’t ask anyone to stop believing what they believe; it asks them to stop turning belief into theater. And in a political culture that rewards performance, that’s a surprisingly sharp constraint.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Barry
Add to List









