"Today, we talk a lot about terrorism, but we rarely talk about state terrorism"

The quote by Bianca Jagger highlights a vital and typically neglected element of discussions surrounding terrorism in modern-day discourse. When individuals discuss terrorism, they generally refer to acts dedicated by non-state actors, such as terrorist organizations or lone individuals. These conversations frequently center on the threats presented by groups like ISIS, al-Qaeda, or different other organizations understood for violent, destabilizing acts targeting civilians or federal governments to achieve political, ideological, or spiritual goals.

Jagger's statement urges us to widen our perspective and consider the actions of state actors that might likewise fall under the umbrella of terrorism. "State terrorism" refers to instances where federal governments use fear as a tool to control or intimidate populations, both locally and worldwide. This can consist of various actions such as genocide, ethnic cleansing, illegal imprisonment, suppression of political dissent, or hidden operations that instill worry and insecurity.

The conversation around state terrorism is often less prevalent for several factors. Political alliances, tactical interests, and diplomatic relationships can make it unpleasant or undesirable for countries to call out other states publicly. In addition, the narrative in global politics frequently paints state stars as genuine wielders of power, consequently excluding their actions from the "terrorism" label. This point of view can lead to a biased view, where the atrocities committed by non-state stars get widespread condemnation, while equally or more damaging actions by states may be minimized, ignored, or even warranted as needed for preserving state security.

Jagger's quote challenges us to reflect on the dichotomy in the discourse around terrorism, advising a more nuanced and equitable examination of all kinds of violence. By acknowledging state terrorism, there's a push towards a more comprehensive understanding of how power can be abused and a require accountability, promoting a more just global political environment. It's a suggestion to not let sovereignty and political power obscure the ethical evaluation of actions that may damage innocent lives and destabilize societies.