"War on terrorism defines the central preoccupation of the United States in the world today, and it does reflect in my view a rather narrow and extremist vision of foreign policy of the world's first superpower, of a great democracy, with genuinely idealistic traditions"

Zbigniew Brzezinski's quote offers a vital perspective on U.S. diplomacy characteristics in the early 21st century, particularly in the context of the so-called "War on Terror". Brzezinski, a respected political researcher and previous National Security Advisor under President Jimmy Carter, utilizes this declaration to highlight his concerns about the focus and technique of U.S. diplomacy.

By stating that the "War on terrorism defines the main fixation of the United States on the planet today", Brzezinski recommends that the U.S. has actually become extremely engrossed in counter-terrorism efforts, possibly at the expense of other critical international problems. This emphasis shows an extremely reactive policy stance, prioritizing instant hazards over long-lasting strategic difficulties such as environment change, international hardship, or diplomatic disputes that require nuanced, multifaceted methods.

Even more, when Brzezinski explains this focus as showing "a rather narrow and extremist vision", he suggests that the U.S. approach is out of proportion and possibly myopic. It suggests a disposition towards military solutions and aggressive strategies instead of diplomacy and cooperation. This viewpoint critiques the U.S. for potentially alienating allies and cultivating worldwide instability, as an overemphasis on military intervention and counter-terrorism can breed bitterness and intensify conflicts.

Brzezinski contrasts the current policy with the idealism that traditionally characterized American democracy, meaning the nation's starting concepts such as liberty, justice, and worldwide partnership. By pointing out "really optimistic customs", he calls for a go back to these values, advocating for a broader, more balanced diplomacy that aligns with these suitables. This would involve a focus on international collaborations, humanitarian efforts, and diplomatic resolutions, pursuing a worldwide leadership function that maintains democratic perfects and contributes favorably to global peace and stability.

In summary, Brzezinski's critique works as a require introspection and recalibration of U.S. foreign policy, urging leaders to make sure that policies are consistent with American democratic values and are responsive to a wider array of global obstacles.