"Tolerance is giving to every other human being every right that you claim for yourself"
About this Quote
Tolerance, for Robert G. Ingersoll, is not a mood of benevolence but a principle of reciprocity. If you claim the right to speak, worship, assemble, love, and live without coercion, you must recognize those same rights in others, including those whose convictions repel you. That symmetry turns tolerance from a private sentiment into a public ethic: the practice of applying one standard of freedom consistently, not only when it benefits your own side.
Ingersoll, a 19th-century American orator and lawyer known as the Great Agnostic, championed abolition, womens rights, and free thought during an era riven by sectarianism and the aftermath of civil war. He fought blasphemy laws and defended the unpopular, insisting that liberty loses its meaning when it becomes a privilege for the like-minded. The statement distills Enlightenment and constitutional ideals into a simple test: your commitment to rights is real only if it extends to those you would rather silence.
This view rejects both hypocrisy and indulgent relativism. Tolerance does not require approval or moral neutrality; it requires restraint from coercion. You can argue, persuade, and protest, but you cannot demand that the state or the mob erase anothers freedom because it offends you. At the same time, reciprocity implies limits: a right for each person exists only insofar as it can exist for all. Acts that trample others lives or liberties are not protected by tolerance; they violate the very reciprocity that grounds it.
Practiced consistently, this ethic makes pluralism possible. It shifts power from the majoritys preferences to the rule of law and equal dignity. It demands humility, because it asks you to defend the rights of opponents today knowing your own rights may depend on the same principle tomorrow. Ingersolls challenge remains bracing: freedom worth having is freedom shared, and the only credible claim to ones own rights is the willingness to extend them to everyone else.
Ingersoll, a 19th-century American orator and lawyer known as the Great Agnostic, championed abolition, womens rights, and free thought during an era riven by sectarianism and the aftermath of civil war. He fought blasphemy laws and defended the unpopular, insisting that liberty loses its meaning when it becomes a privilege for the like-minded. The statement distills Enlightenment and constitutional ideals into a simple test: your commitment to rights is real only if it extends to those you would rather silence.
This view rejects both hypocrisy and indulgent relativism. Tolerance does not require approval or moral neutrality; it requires restraint from coercion. You can argue, persuade, and protest, but you cannot demand that the state or the mob erase anothers freedom because it offends you. At the same time, reciprocity implies limits: a right for each person exists only insofar as it can exist for all. Acts that trample others lives or liberties are not protected by tolerance; they violate the very reciprocity that grounds it.
Practiced consistently, this ethic makes pluralism possible. It shifts power from the majoritys preferences to the rule of law and equal dignity. It demands humility, because it asks you to defend the rights of opponents today knowing your own rights may depend on the same principle tomorrow. Ingersolls challenge remains bracing: freedom worth having is freedom shared, and the only credible claim to ones own rights is the willingness to extend them to everyone else.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List





