"We believe democracy to be the only real guarantor of stability and we have sought to create a 'Jordanian model' that might also inspire others in our region. I wish democracy and peace to be my legacy to my people and the shield of generations to come"

King Hussein I articulates a profound faith in democracy as the key to enduring national stability. He frames democracy not merely as a political system but as a protective force for his country, suggesting that true and lasting order is achieved only when people have a voice in their governance. By referring to democracy as a “real guarantor,” he implies skepticism toward authoritarian forms of stability that may appear effective in the short term but lack a sustainable foundation.

His mention of the “Jordanian model” implies a distinct approach, tailored to the nation’s unique history and social fabric. By striving to create a local interpretation of democracy, King Hussein emphasizes the importance of cultural appropriateness and gradual political evolution rather than the wholesale adoption of foreign systems. Still, he aspires for Jordan’s example to extend beyond its borders, expressing a hope that the country’s democratic experiment could positively influence neighboring states, many of which in the 20th century faced conflict or autocratic rule. This ambition positions Jordan as a beacon for peaceful reform in a region marked by instability and contrasts with perceptions of democracy as a Western import, showing it can be reimagined within regional traditions and realities.

Furthermore, King Hussein ties his vision for his country to a deeply personal ambition: to leave behind a legacy defined by democracy and peace. He desires that his contribution would not only transform his contemporaries’ lives but also serve as a safeguard for future generations. The metaphor of democracy and peace as both “legacy” and “shield” hearkens to the dual role of these ideals: they uplift society, granting freedoms and rights, while also defending society from future threats, whether they be internal discord or external aggression. This reflects a leader’s hope to be remembered as a steward of national wellbeing, providing for his people not just in the present moment, but far into the future.